With the 2026-27 season kicking off this weekend, Premier League football teams are facing a new set of rules. But these ones aren’t enforced on the pitch, they’re being enforced by the Premier League board.
As the Premier League has adapted to a new era of fan engagement and interaction, teams are holding huge amounts of personal data, including names, email addresses, credentials, and even financial information. These place them at greater risk of data leaks and make them a primary target for cyber attacks.
In order to ensure teams take the necessary steps to protect both their data and the data of their fans, the board can impose fines of up to £100,000 for teams that don’t meet the requirements across backups, incident response, risk management, security assurance and much more.
What do the new rules mean for Premier League teams?
The teams previously had to align with a non-prescriptive security baseline issued in 2024, but the new rules place requirements on teams with deadlines for their implementation.
If these deadlines are not met, the teams can be subject to the aforementioned fine, or referred to an independent commission.
The teams will be required to meet the first set of requirements by April 30, 2027, with further requirements to be met in April 2028 and April 2029. The teams will also have to assess their own compliance by January 10 each year, with a final assessment and evidence submitted to the Premier League board by April 30.
The board can also request additional detail and evidence where needed to track a team’s progress in adhering to the new rules. If a team does not meet requirements during the interim stage it must submit a plan on how it aims to become compliant within 28 days.
Expert perspectives on Premier League cybersecurity rules
Muhammad Yahya Patel, vCISO and cybersecurity advisor for EMEA, Huntress:
The Premier League introducing mandatory cybersecurity standards is the right move, but the detail is where the questions start. £100,000 sounds significant until you remember that top Premier League clubs generate revenues north of £600 million annually.
The phased timeline, April 2027, 2028, 2029, is pragmatic but slow given the threat environment. Waiting until 2029 for full compliance gives attackers three more seasons to find the weakest link.
£100,000 sounds significant until you remember that top Premier League clubs generate revenues north of £600 million annually.
That said, the direction is unambiguously right. Moving from a non-prescriptive roadmap to formal requirements with deadlines and evidence submissions is a meaningful structural shift.
Backups, incident response, risk management, and recovery testing are exactly the right foundations. The Premier League doing this proactively rather than reactively before a major breach forces the issue deserves genuine credit.
Most governing bodies wait for the headline incident. This one didn’t. The real test is enforcement appetite. Rules without credible consequences change nothing.
Jamie Akhtar, CEO and Co-founder, CyberSmart:
This is an important shift for the Premier League. Cyber security is moving from being viewed primarily as an IT responsibility to becoming an enforceable element of club governance.
Football clubs hold significant volumes of sensitive supporter, employee and player data, while also relying on systems for ticketing, payments, stadium access and match-day operations. Making areas such as backups, incident response, risk management and security assurance mandatory reflects the reality that a serious cyber incident can quickly become an operational, financial and reputational crisis.
For clubs, compliance should not become an annual box-ticking exercise.
For clubs, compliance should not become an annual box-ticking exercise. They need clear board-level ownership of cyber risk, an accurate inventory of critical systems and data, tested and segregated backups, rehearsed incident-response and recovery plans, strong identity and access controls, and effective oversight of third-party suppliers.
Just as importantly, clubs should continuously collect evidence that these controls are operating effectively. The organisations that treat the new requirements as a minimum baseline for resilience, rather than simply a regulatory hurdle, will be in the strongest position when an attack inevitably tests those controls.
Anna Collard, SVP of Content Strategy and CISO Advisor, KnowBe4:
Good to see the Premier League treating cybersecurity as a governance issue rather than an IT afterthought. Mandatory rules with real financial consequences (fines of up to £100,000) send the right signal: boards are expected to own this risk, not just delegate it.
As I've said before, sport is uniquely exposed because it runs on the very emotions social engineers exploit: passion, urgency, loyalty and trust.
But fines only address one side of the equation. As I've said before, sport is uniquely exposed because it runs on the very emotions social engineers exploit: passion, urgency, loyalty and trust.
A rushed transfer payment, a fan chasing tickets, an official acting on a "verified" WhatsApp message from someone posing as a coach or chairperson, these are moments of heightened emotion and time pressure, exactly when human judgment degrades. That's not a firewall problem.
It's worth remembering that one of the most costly incidents in this sector involved a Premier League club being spear-phished during a £1 million transfer negotiation. That wasn't a technical breach, but a person deceived at a moment of pressure.
Rules with teeth are a welcome start. But real resilience means pairing compliance with genuine behavioural readiness, for example helping people recognise urgency as a red flag, not a reason to skip verification.
Cian Heasley, Principal Consultant, Acumen Cyber:
I think it’s a positive step forward. Football clubs are attractive targets because they hold large volumes of sensitive data, process significant financial transactions and rely on operational systems where disruption can have very real consequences. Moving from advisory guidance to enforceable standards creates much-needed accountability, and the financial incentive will inevitably help drive action.
Requiring clubs to have a clear plan, aligned to defined standards and delivered within a set timeframe, also gives them something measurable to work towards. The key will be making sure those standards provide clear structure rather than leaving too much open to interpretation.
The key will be making sure those standards provide clear structure rather than leaving too much open to interpretation.
The focus on backups, incident response and recovery is particularly important. Preventing every incident simply isn’t realistic, so clubs need to prove they can recover quickly when something does happen. If clubs are working towards common standards, there is also a real opportunity to share lessons around what works, where implementation falls short and how security can continue to improve across the league.
In November ‘24, Italian club Bologna FC confirmed a ransomware attack claimed by the RansomHub group, which exfiltrated sensitive data. After the club declined to meet the ransom demand, the ransomware gang published the full dataset on the dark web. The leaked material reportedly included player and sponsor information, and the attackers went as far as invoking GDPR exposure to pressure the club into paying, a tactic that turns a club's own regulatory obligations into leverage.
More recently, Dutch club Ajax was named among the organisations affected by the CEVA Logistics breach, where customer data was exposed through a shared shipping vendor rather than a direct compromise, underlining that supply-chain exposure is also as material a risk as any attack on a club's own estate.
Taken together, these incidents show why these rules were needed then, though they are pitched as proactive, they must also be driven by these football-related breaches.
The £100,000 ceiling is modest against the true cost of a serious incident and the amounts of money tied up in football clubs, so the value lies less in the sanction and more in compelling clubs to build tested backups, incident response and recovery capability before they are needed. The Bologna case in particular demonstrates that ransomware leaks can be damaging, which makes resilience and data minimisation far more important than any assumption that a club can negotiate its way out of trouble.
How do I submit my own perspective on emerging news?
If you have an expert perspective you would like to share on an emerging story or particular topic, please get in contact here: benedict.collins@futurenet.com
from Latest from TechRadar https://ift.tt/optvc4e
I don’t like ChatGPT’s latest voice model . If yo...
I don’t like ChatGPT’s latest voice model. If you don’t use voice to interact with ChatGPT, this might seem like a strange thing to get worked up about, so let me explain.
Until recently, its voices have all sounded fairly advanced. But there was still something unmistakably AI-y about them. At times, they sounded smooth and even expressive, but also stunted and, well, robotic.
The latest voice update attempts to smooth away the rest of those more robotic edges. Which means that ChatGPT now pauses, hesitates, changes intonation and adds lots of little noises humans make without even thinking about it.
There are lots of “umms” and “hmms”. There are plenty of drawn out “yeeeahs”, as well as enthusiastic “ooohs”. Sometimes it sounds like it’s taking a breath or sighing. Sometimes it pauses halfway through a thought. And often its voice rises at the end of a sentence. In other words, it’s been changed to sound more human and I find it incredibly annoying.
When I first tried it, I thought it was broken. Especially because of the way it said a filler word then paused. Once I’d heard three long “hmmms” in a row, I couldn’t pay attention to anything else it was saying in response. So I decided to turn my irritation into an experiment. I opened the different voices in ChatGPT, started talking and counted all of the filler words.
The filler word experiment
I started with Maple, one of ChatGPT’s more cheerful, female-sounding voices, and within a conversation that lasted about 5 minutes I counted 20 “hmmms”. There were also lots of elongated “yeeeahs”, a couple of “uhhhhs”, an “ooooh”, a “hmm nice” and several enthusiastic “yeah, totally” responses.
There was also a lot of rising intonation, which is when the pitch of the voice goes up at the end of a sentence. That made me wonder whether I was just getting hung up on some speech quirks that were more associated with US English than ChatGPT, so I switched voices.
Next, I tried Vale. It’s a bright and inquisitive British female voice. Interestingly, Vale had a different set of verbal habits. There were fewer “hmmms”, but plenty of “ohhh yeeeahs”, long “suuuures” and a few “riiiights”. And its intonation also seemed to rise constantly, particularly when it was asking me questions.
I thought I’d try a more obviously male-sounding voice next. I chose Arbor, another British voice, which I found calmer but much more stilted. It gave me way less of those exaggerated conversational noises that I disliked in Maple, but replaced them with strange pauses and a staccato rhythm. At times it seemed to stop talking in really odd places.
After around 20 minutes of conversations across the different voices, I'd counted more than 100 filler words and conversational noises.
(Image credit: Getty Images / VCG / d3sign)
Falling for the filler words
I’d gone into these conversations with ChatGPT looking for things that irritated me. I was listening closely for every “umm”, strange pause and exaggerated “yeeeah”. I was intentionally trying to count all the quirks OpenAI had added to ChatGPT’s voice to make it sound more like a person.
But, weirdly, the conversation started to feel different. I reluctantly began talking about priorities and my week ahead to test the voices. And instead of giving ChatGPT prompts and waiting for its responses, I soon found myself slipping into a much more natural conversation. This surprised me because I still didn’t like the voices.
The filler words reamined distracting and the pauses were still in all the wrong places. At no point was I convinced that there was a person on the other side of the conversation. But I had to admit that although on a conscious level I am wary about AI, and the whole point of this was to scrutinize the system, I still seemed to be responding to its more natural-sounding voice by getting increasingly wrapped up in the conversation.
Whether you find that cool or worrying probably comes down to your broader opinions about AI and its influence on us.
Why does AI need to say “hmmm”?
There’s an obvious reason for making ChatGPT sound more natural, which is that humans find natural conversation easier, and are therefore more likely to continue engaging with it.
Real, everyday speech isn’t a clean stream of information. All of us pause, hesitate, change pitch, make noises to show someone we’re listening and use filler words while we’re thinking about what to say next. These small but significant parts of speech do a lot of work.
So what are they doing when AI uses them? Because ChatGPT doesn’t need to say “hmm” when it’s gathering its thoughts or “yeeeeah” to show you it’s listening. It could just retrieve the information and respond. So these sounds are for making interactions feel more conversational, which is what makes me wary.
AI companies frequently position their AI systems as tools that can help us work, learn, create and get things done. When people like me worry about us all becoming too reliant on AI, we're often told that what matters is how we use the tool. But this is just one example of how the tool itself seems designed to behave less like a tool every day.
A calculator doesn’t need to add in a filler word before it gives you an answer and a word processor doesn’t need to pause and say “hmmm, yeah, totally!” when you start typing. But that’s what ChatGPT is now doing.
Some might argue that a voice with a more natural-sounding rhythm and intonation is simply just a nicer experience. But those same choices make interactions feel more social, potentially blurring the line between the role of AI as a tool and something we relate to more like another person.
After my experience, I wasn’t surprised to find research suggesting there might be more to this. Research suggests that voice-based interactions with AI might be associated with increase emotional engagement and anthropomorphism.
This doesn’t automatically mean that adding some “umms” will make us all trust AI. But it seems that adding voice into the mix does change how we perceive and respond to it.
(Image credit: Getty Images)
Annoying but effective
One more practical learning from this experiment was that if ChatGPT's voice suddenly drives you mad after the update, try another one. The differences between them felt bigger than I expected. Initially, I couldn't stand Maple's mannerisms and rising intonation, but Arbor's calmer delivery was easier for me to tolerate, even if its strange pauses created a different pacing problem.
I went into this experiment expecting to write about an annoying voice update. I thought I'd count some “umms”, complain about how artificial all of this manufactured naturalness sounded and then just return to typing. Instead, I spent 20 minutes deliberately studying the mechanisms designed to make AI sound more conversational and still found myself becoming more conversational with it.
I knew the hesitation wasn’t genuine hesitation. I knew there wasn’t anyone on the other side of the exchange thinking, listening and searching for the right words. Yet I still responded to the signals by talking more naturally and, eventually, being more open.
I don't think that means I was somehow fooled into believing ChatGPT was human. But I think what it suggests is that we don’t have to believe AI is conscious, or there’s some form of life there, for our deeply ingrained social instincts to start responding to human-like cues.
So, while I still wince at every “hmmm”, I don’t think whether I like the filler words or not really matters. It’s more about what they make us do and how surprisingly instinctive my response to them was.
from Latest from TechRadar https://ift.tt/RiY4zZf
The xTool M2 is priced at the entry level of the ...
The xTool M2 is priced at the entry level of the company’s fully enclosed machines, but as ever there’s no mistaking it for anything other than an xTool laser engraver. As I got into using the machine, I could see just how finely tuned it is. Whilst it’s lighter weight than many of its more expensive siblings, the laser engraving power, even from the 10W laser in my review sample, was exceptionally good.
Having reviewed these laser engravers for a few years now, there are several essentials I look for in any laser engraver for TechRadar Pro, and one top priority is that it's fully enclosed. While I might’ve looked at fully open designs earlier on, these days there’s really no excuse for an open-frame design other than cost. When it comes to running a business, safety is obviously paramount, so it makes sense to look for a fully enclosed rather than open-frame design.
Beyond the physical design, I've found a few extras that really help with the review process, simplifying the cutting, engraving, and placement of materials such as cameras. Then there are added features, such as air assist, that are essential for creating clean, crisp lines and reducing scorching.
What’s surprising for a machine of this price is that the M2 ticks all the boxes. It has dual cameras, one that gives you a good view of the entire workspace and a second that gives you a close-up view, air assistance built in, and, as ever, there’s a vent at the back that you can attach to your air filtration system.
But it goes even further by adding more head module options, so you can not only laser cut and engrave but also print and cut. Of course, coming from xTool, it also has a range of accessories that can further expand what you can do with this machine.
I’ve had the M2 for a couple of months and have really been able to give it a more extensive test than I usually would with these machines, partially because I’m interested in getting some of these for use within an educational establishment, and making sure that it’s easy, secure and robust enough is a major focus.
I’ve also been asked by several friends who have been looking at laser engraving machines and which option they should go for. At this price point and with the 610 × 569mm dimensions, it just, on paper at least, looks like a great option.
Sure enough, while I only have the 10W laser model to review in this test, I have looked at previous XTool machines with multiple module heads, and they’ve worked exceptionally well; I will take a look at the print and cutting heads later.
Initial setup was easy, and after I’d run through the unpacking, installing the module head and powering up, it was then just a case of connecting the USB cable directly to my MacBook Pro, installing xTool Studio, waiting for it to connect, allowing the firmware to update, and it was time to start.
The one slight oddity with the modular head is that it installs magnetically, although it requires a connecting cable for data from the head to the machine, which I found a little odd. Why this isn’t wireless or just uses contacts, I have no idea; possibly just to keep costs down, but once that cable is connected, getting into the utilisation of the machine is all pretty fast.
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
What I like is that xTool has now introduced a safety video at the beginning, with a longer version that you can view online, and a really good tutorial which essentially enables you to get started with cutting projects such as placemats. You can see the results of this project in the pictures.
Those initial tutorials are essentially a no-brainer setup guide to using the M2, and when you run through those initial projects, which will take you less than an hour, you’ll be pretty proficient with how the machine works.
As ever, in the software you’re able to assign different parts to different cutting, engraving and scoring methods with a simple click; you highlight a path, enabling you to then assign it to whichever type of cut you want. Again, with xTool’s knowledge in the sector, this is all incredibly well thought out.
Essentially, over my two months with the machine, it sat in the corner of the workshop, attached to one of the xTool air filters, and ran seamlessly for every project I’ve thrown at it.
The workflow, from the ability to recognise the materials through to being able to preview so that you can accurately place your designs, and through to the cutting and extraction, all just works incredibly easily.
At present, if you’re looking for a new, fast, relatively cheap professional-level laser engraver for a small business, then you really can’t go wrong with the superb M2.
xTool M2: Price & availability
At present, the xTool M2 is available for $599 / £599 direct from xTool with the 10W laser. I've also often seen promotional offers on this price, so just keep an eye out.
If you’re looking for the colour print-and-cut bundle, which lets you make stickers and other projects, it's available for $749 / £749. There’s also the deluxe bundle, which includes everything, available for $989 / £989.
The laser cutter and engraver is also widely available from online retailers like Amazon.
xTool M2: Design
Specs
Connectivity: USB computer connection confirmed; xTool software required. Audio: Status buzzer Camera: 5MP close-view camera + 16MP distance-view camera. Size: 610 × 569 × 180mm Weight: 12.3kg Software: xTool software / xTool Studio ecosystem Accessories: Depending on the bundle: laser module, CMYK inkjet module, RA3 Lite rotary system and other accessories. Laser: 10W or 20W blue diode; optional 3W infrared module. Laser work area: 426 × 320mm for 10W/20W modules. Maximum XY speed: 600mm/s. Maximum cutting claim: Up to 8mm basswood with 10W; up to 10mm with 20W. Safety: Class 1 enclosed laser system.
The xTool M2 is instantly recognisable as xTool, with its sleek, simple white body and protective transparent yellow hinged lift-up lid. What’s impressive for a machine at this price is that it measures 610 × 569 × 180mm and weighs 12.3kg, which is handy, as I had to move it around quite a lot over the two months to install and remove other machines.
Part of the reason that this machine has been kept out in the workshop for so long is its manoeuvrability; when I needed it, I could just move it over to my computer desk. It was very easy to lift, carry and place, something that I don’t usually find with most of the laser engravers, other than the designs that I tend to avoid.
The full enclosure means this machine has a Class 1 laser safety classification, making it better suited to domestic small business and educational environments. If you work in a business, check whether your insurance covers this device classification.
The transparent upper cover helps keep everything safe; it's yellow and prevents the laser beams from exiting the machine. It also lets you monitor the laser engraving, and the two internal cameras let you view what’s going on remotely.
What’s impressive is that the relatively low-profile design accommodates objects up to 100mm thick. This is essentially for direct cylindrical engraving and without the use of any type of riser base.
It’s also great to see that there is built-in air assist, essentially keeping the smoke away from the beam where the laser hits the material, something which is usually done by an external pump. However, you still ideally need an air filter to use with the machine, or you can vent it out a window.
On inspection, it does feel a little more plasticky than the more expensive xTool machines. However, it’s still a great-quality, solid machine; when I moved it around the workshop, it felt robust.
Another point here is that, with such a large transparent upper cover- something that I have had issues with on other manufacturers’ models in the past, especially splitting- the design of that lid is again good on my unit, although the hinges are free and not sprung or cushioned. After what must be hundreds of openings and closings, it’s still in excellent condition.
One of the slight oddities of the design, which seems to be the case with so many of these enclosed laser engravers, is that there’s no honeycomb grid included in the box. Instead, you get four magnetic clamps that clamp onto the corners of any material you place, plus four alignment markers on the base of the machine.
At first, I wasn’t overly impressed with the design of these clamps. I would’ve preferred the honeycomb grid. However, it doesn’t take long before you realise just how useful they are, and not only do they hold offcuts of work nicely and securely, but they’re also extremely easy to use. After a few days of using them, I warmed to them and now see them as a slightly preferred method, to the point where I’ve made a few additional ones on the Prusa Core One to add to the original four.
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
xTool M2: Features
What you get is a feature-packed machine from xTool, and in this review I’m focusing on the 10W laser, so that’s the entry-level version, but there is also a 20W blue laser available as well if you do need a little bit more power or, for that matter, speed.
Other modular heads are available, such as the 3W IR laser, which is designed for metal and plastic engraving. However, that’s not yet available on the market, and there’s an optional full-colour CMYK inkjet system with 1200dpi resolution and 40ml cartridge capacity. This is used alongside a cutter so you can create stickers and other printable objects.
One of the big features for me is the dual camera system. You have a 2-megapixel close-view camera and a 5-megapixel distance-view camera. These are both really useful, especially if you’re trying to refine the positioning of your designs.
From my experience with these machines, especially the F2 Ultra recently, I’d say this close-up camera is especially useful when using the 3W IR module and will probably also come in handy if you’re into printing stickers.
Like any product released today, AI plays a major role through the software. You have the automatic creation system, which is just a point-and-click system: give it a text description, and it will develop something for you.
But more than that, there’s also automatic material detection, which can essentially see what’s put into the workspace, evaluate it, and come up with a close match; through the test, I was really impressed with how well this worked. Essentially, once the material is detected, it adjusts all the settings to optimise for that material, rather than you having to look at a chart or work through trial and error.
Another major feature is the built-in adjustable air assist. You can adjust this in the software, but it essentially blows air across the laser, keeping the site where the laser meets the material clear of smoke. This means you get a much cleaner cut, and it also helps reduce scorching.
When it comes to file support, xTool, as ever, has an increasing library of assets that you can dip into to get straight into producing products. However, if you do want to import your own, then the new software supports SVG, DXF and PDF, and there’s plenty of flexibility, especially with the AI tool, to have a bit of fun with those files as well.
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
One feature I really like, especially when trying to cram as many designs onto one sheet of 3mm basswood as possible, is the new smart nesting and batch filters, which, again, are activated through the software.
These seemed to work really well, optimising the spacing on the sheet of basswood well beyond anything that I could do myself, and once again this helps to cut down on costs.
In the software, when I entered a few materials that weren’t recognised by the system, there is a huge material database. This can be a little daunting, but you can take control of the settings manually if you need to. Just do a quick test chart, and then you should have the settings that you need for engraving, scoring and cutting almost any material.
As ever, being from xTool, there’s a range of accessories, including a rotary engraving system for cylindrical and spherical objects. Still, there’s a full list, and it is extensive on the xTool website.
xTool M2: Performance
As ever with these laser engravers, they’re either quick to set up and calibrate or it takes most of the day; thankfully, because this machine is from the xTool stable, it’s extremely easy to unbox and get up and running. That said, the paper manual inside was a little on the sparse side, even for xTool.
However, two very large QR codes on the packaging link directly to the online setup instructions and manual, which include plenty of pictures and information. The point is that the setup is extremely straightforward: position the M2, remove all the packaging, plug in the power, install the laser module with the connecting cable to the machine, and switch on.
Then, in the software, wait for it to connect, run any updates and follow, firstly, the safety guidance, which is a very quick video of less than two minutes, and then follow the tutorials. After completing it, you should be up and running.
Once I’d created some of the tutorial projects, including the placemats, I moved on to my own projects, creating a few boxes, a small display shelving unit and a few other bits and pieces, including a bracket that I needed for my van, and throughout I was impressed with how quick and easy this machine is to use.
This is, of course, an entry-level machine in the pro market of laser engraving, so whilst the machine is extremely competent, through use you do start to notice a few small design points. These points highlight that this is an enthusiast-level machine rather than a pro-level one.
The first of these is the overall design. Whilst the design is solid and works exceptionally well, there’s no kill switch on the side. If you want to use this in education or most workplaces, you’ll need to add something to kill the power yourself.
But really, other than that, there is very little here that doesn’t impress, even when you’re used to using something like the xTool P2. For me, the workflow from the P2 down to the M2 is similar; it’s just a smaller machine.
While it is obviously slower and less powerful, that 10W laser module will happily cut through basswood up to 8mm thick, as quoted by the company. Although I didn’t have any 8mm basswood available, the 3, 4 and 6mm basswood that I generally use cut through with absolutely no issue whatsoever in a single pass.
The maximum speed for the cutter is 600 mm per minute, which is mid-range, and in the test you obviously reduce that depending on whether it is cutting or engraving. What really impressed me was the engraving resolution. If you want to do some really fine detail work, the M2 is an ideal solution, and converting images into halftone and then bringing those in got some stunning results.
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
As I went through the pack of test materials, including paper, wood and leather, I was just really struck by how easy the M2 is to use. The software is obviously great, but those two cameras do make a real difference to the precision of the laser, enabling you to get a preview of the material and really closely align the design to a fraction of a millimetre, which is far better than I have seen on even a lot of fibre lasers, where pure accuracy is definitely needed.
What strikes me about the xTool M2 is that it makes a lot of the more expensive xTool laser engravers a little bit obsolete. You get a relatively lightweight machine you can shift and move around, take off the work surface, and easily place on a lower shelf when not in use, freeing up loads of space.
You get a 10W laser for general work, and you can purchase the 20W when you need a little extra power or speed, plus a modular head system with the inkjet so you can push it for further projects.
What I liked was that the workspace area inside the machine is pretty decent, and whilst it’s not the largest out there, it’s surprisingly large for a machine of this size and far easier and safer to use than any open-frame laser engraver on the market.
While in this review I’ve looked at the M2 in isolation, it is worth pointing out that alongside the laser engraving machine, I have also added in the extractor filter, which is essential. I will update this review with the print head and cutter and possibly the 20W head at a later date.
xTool M2: Final verdict
The M2 is really easy to recommend. It’s a very well-priced, fully enclosed laser engraving machine.
A few things really make it stand out against much of the competition, including the built-in air assist, so no extra devices are sitting around on the work surface. But for me, what appealed was that I could quickly lift it and stow it away.
It’s a big machine, but at just over 12kg it’s not particularly heavy, and it’s quick and easy to disconnect and then plug back in.
Unlike some machines that require you to disconnect various pedal switches, air assist, and more, the M2 took a couple of minutes to disconnect and stash, then bring out and get up and running again.
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
In the workplace, one major downside is that it doesn’t have that kill switch on the side, which will be an issue. Still, everything else is simple, and if you’re a small business, it makes a lot of sense.
Here you have a high-quality, high-end enthusiast or pro-level machine with a 10W laser. This lets you engrave plenty of materials, and you can also add the inkjet module to create stickers if you want. Plus, with a rotary tool, you can flip the head from vertical to horizontal to engrave cups, mugs, and more.
I’ve looked at plenty of these laser engravers over the last few years, and the xTool machines have always stood out for quality and attention to workflow; the M2 is especially polished for its price point and the audience it’s aimed at.
Should you buy the xTool M2
Value:
One of the most versatile machines that I’ve looked at for the price, making it exceptional value
5
Design:
Great design; I just wish there was no need for the cable between the head and the machine
4.5
Features
Excellent range of features, and with a modular head and accessories, the possibilities are enormous
4.5
Performance
SSpeed, cutting power, and workflow are well balanced at this price range
4.5
Total
A superb, fully enclosed laser engraver at this price and a perfect option for any small business
5
Buy it if...
You want an all-in-one machine If you have a small business or you’re a keen laser engraving enthusiast, then the fully enclosed design and flexibility to print, cut and engrave from this one machine make it a superb choice.
You need easier alignment This is the first machine that I have seen with such accurate alignment for designs over materials, and the dual cameras just work incredibly well compared with other systems.View Deal
Don't buy it if...
You only need powerful engraving. If you need a fast, dedicated laser engraver, the 20W option will boost power, but it’s nothing compared with larger machines such as the xTool P2.
You’re working in an industrial environment. While the machine is feature-packed, the lack of a side kill switch could be an issue, so check your safety requirements before purchasing the M2.View Deal
Watch Hull vs Man Utd live streams as the Tigers face a huge test in their first game back in the Premier League against a United side looking to build on a hugely impressive run under now-permanent manager Michael Carrick.
Back in the top flight for the first time since suffering relegation in 2017, Hull surprised many last season by defying a transfer embargo and overcoming Middlesbrough in the play-off final. They’ll start the new campaign as relegation candidates but have significantly improved the squad over the summer, with talented Aussie centre-back Luca Herrington the pick of the signings. However, goals could be an issue, having found the net just once in their final three friendlies.
After a nightmare spell under Ruben Amorim, United fans will feel they are back on the right track with Carrick at the helm. The 45-year-old lost just two of his 17 games as caretaker manager and, having been handed the job full-time, has strengthened the squad with the additions of Andrey Santos and Youri Tielemans. Yet it is the form in pre-season of Bryan Mbeumo and Amad Diallo that has supporters excited, as both attackers look razor sharp and will be relishing the trip to the MKM Stadium.
Read on for our dedicated guide on how to stream Hull vs Man Utd in the Premier League, live and from anywhere in the world.
Can I watch Hull vs Man Utd for free?
Hull vs Man Utd isn't technically available for free anywhere; however, there is a way for viewers in the US to watch at no cost.
US coverage is live on USA Network, which can be accessed via YouTube TV, Hulu + Live TV and DirecTV Stream and all have free trials of varying lengths for new customers.
Not in the US? Use NordVPN to access your USA Network stream – more details below.
Hull vs Man Utd team news
TBC
Use a VPN to watch Hull vs Man Utd from anywhere
A VPN is a handy piece of software that can make your device appear as if it's back in your home country, thereby letting you unlock your usual streaming service. The best VPN right now? We recommend NordVPN – it does everything and comes with a 75% discount.
Not having a VPN is like leaving your front door wide open in a busy city – anyone can walk right in and take a peek.
TechRadar regularly reviews all the biggest and best VPN providers and NordVPN is our #1 choice.
✅ Up to 75% off today ✅ 3 extra months free ✅ Unlocks YouTube TV
Get NordVPN and stream Hull vs Man Utd from anywhere.View Deal
It's really straightforward to use a VPN to watch Hull vs Man Utd.
1. Install the VPN of your choice. As we've said, NordVPN is our favorite.
2. Choose the location you wish to connect to in the VPN app. For example, if you want to watch the TNT Sports via HBO Max stream, select 'United Kingdom' from the listed countries.
3. Sit back and enjoy the action. Head to HBO Max and tune into Hull vs Man Utd.
How to watch Hull vs Man Utd live streams in the US
Hull vs Man Utd will be shown on USA Network in the US.
USA Network is part of NBC Universal, which holds the Premier League broadcast rights in the US.
Outside the US this Saturday? Use NordVPN to unlock your stream of the game.
How to watch Hull vs Man Utd live streams in the UK
Fans in the UK can watch Hull vs Man Utd on TNT Sports.
The game will be live on TNT Sports 1 and via its streaming partner HBO Max. A subscription costs £30.99 per month on a rolling monthly contract, or £25.99 per month for a minimum 12-month term.
Not in the UK right now? Use NordVPN to watch Hull vs Man Utd on HBO Max.
How to watch Hull vs Man Utd live streams in Canada
Fubo is the Premier League's broadcast partner in Canada and has live coverage of Hull vs Man Utd.
Prices start from CA$31.49 per month for Fubo's Sports Monthly package. You can also watch Fubo's content if you have a selected DAZN subscription in Canada.
Traveling away from Canada? Use NordVPN to access your Premier League live streams from anywhere in the world.
How to watch Hull vs Man Utd live streams in Australia
Hull vs Man Utd will be broadcast on Stan Sport in Australia.
Stan Sport will show all 380 Premier League games, with prices starting at A$29.99/month. This includes a basic Stan plan (A$9.99) and the Sports add-on (A$20).
Missing the game because you're outside Australia?Use a VPN to login to your Stan Sport account.
What is the Hull vs Man Utd start time?
Hull vs Man Utd kicks off at 4.30am PT / 7.30am ET / 12.30pm BST / 9.30pm AEST on Saturday, August 22.
Can I watch Hull vs Man Utd on my mobile?
Of course, most broadcasters have streaming services that you can access through mobile apps or via your phone's browser.
You can also stay up-to-date with all the key Premier League 2026/27 moments on the official social media channels on Instagram (@PremierLeague), TikTok (@PremierLeague) and YouTube (@PremierLeague).
We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example:1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service).2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad.We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.
from Latest from TechRadar https://ift.tt/rNsdmTh
I agreed to test the BodyPark Atom, which aims to...
I agreed to test the BodyPark Atom, which aims to offer the best bits of personal trainer technique feedback, without any of the drawbacks. A small smart speaker-like unit with an AI-powered, body-mapping camera on top, it offers real-time feedback on your movements, plus guided sessions to be completed as part of a larger workout plan. It's magnetized too, so you can take it to the gym and stick it to a squat rack should you need form-correction outside of the home. Workouts and plans can be constructed for you, or you can edit them yourself in the app.
It might look like Star Wars' BB8, but the idea here is to help you dodge the costs of a trainer — and the location and time constraints — by putting some of the best bits into a digital assistant, which uses AI to provide feedback on technique as well as structure workout plans. That means a device that can watch your technique, count reps, and offer feedback to help you improve.
That all sounds great, but I went into testing with a skeptical mindset, having seen how AI can miss the mark entirely when it comes to designing workouts. While the promise of AI is exciting, the reality often isn't so impressive. That was what I came away feeling about the BodyPark Atom, which is helpful and certainly can push newcomers things in the right direction, but is also still a pretty new and developing technology with its own teething issues.
All that said, I would still recommend one of these for anyone looking to improve exercise, avoid injury or progress training plateaus in a novel, fun and affordable way.
Fully equipped
(Image credit: Future)
My usual training involves a gym session twice a week, some boxing, and cardio in the form of either a long run or maybe a long gravel bike ride. I incorporate a dash of swimming, paddle boarding or surfing when possible.
Being able to do a HIIT class, in my kitchen, was a real treat It meant I saved time on doing it at home, I was able to control my environment for comfort, and I could use my own kit like mats and dumbbells as needed. While you can get a thousand different HIIT classes from the likes of YouTube, the BodyPark offers guidance and coaching that static videos don't.
Your form is watched with the 1/2.8-inch CMOS sensor toting and 720p video capturing camera. This maps 34 body key points for over 1,000 exercises recognised (a little like this 3DAT AI fitness coach we tested a couple of years ago), and the AI assistant's live voice coach offers feedback during the movements, ensuring your execution of the move is correct.
The field of view is also massive, 160 degrees horizontal and vertical, meaning even with limited space it's possible to be seen clearly and still get tracked accurately. This is nice in the gym, where you might want to use the device's onboard magnet to attach this to the squat rack as you lift, without getting in anyone's way.
The screen shows the workout you're going to do, although that was often an image and not always a video. This isn't ideal if you're new to a movement and then have to pause the workout to go look up on your phone what to do. Although watching yourself is pretty clear and reading your rep count is too on that 326ppi 1.43-inch AMOLED screen.
You can always watch back your videos and guidance given, from within the app using your phone. This collates all your metrics so you can monitor progress, plan future sessions and generally check-in on how you're doing at any point. Prices start at $219 / £199 / AU$330.
What I loved
(Image credit: Future)
Not having to count your reps really is a fantastic feeling. As someone who generally trains solo, in the gym at least, that mental counting clock has always been on for me. Using a smartwatch always ends up fiddling with buttons or editing incorrect rep counts. Turning that mental load off left me with a bit more bandwidth to focus on my movements and pay attention to the Atom's guidance tips, in a way I hadn't realised was being restricted by the counting focus.
The movement tracking and feedback is also one of the most impressive parts of this setup. Thanks to the 32 points of tracking – all shown on screen – I was able to trust that the device was mapping me accurately and therefore, the advice given was actually helpful.
Even in the few cases it wasn't exact – like telling me to squat lower when I could see I was at 90-degrees – this still forced me to focus on my movement, so during future lifts I was posture-aware. Even if the advice isn't perfect every time, it gets you thinking internally in a way that will help train you to self-correct in the long run.
For squat and deadlift correction, where technique can really make all the difference to progress, this worked fantastically. As mentioned, you can magnetically attach it to the rack at the gym. Even with movements from others in the gym, or lighting troubles, this performs really well so you just attach and start without worry.
The battery life is also pretty great at 72 hours recording time. That meant I could use this all week, and beyond, without needing to even think about charging it back up. The charger is USB-C.
The company claims the Atom offers a 96% body tracking accuracy rate and, in my experience, that feels about right. Rep counting was 100% accurate, which left me with a fair amount of confidence in the device. In reality it was the infancy of the software that proved more challenging,
What I didn't love
(Image credit: Future)
At this price, it's tough to complain about what is essentially a personal trainer and selection of workout classes rolled into one. You're probably getting thousands of dollars or pounds of value.
That said, there is room for improvement. Hardware is superb and I struggle to find fault, but on the software side, I'd like a bit more reassurance. This is a device that you are essentially entrusting a lot of your bodily health with. If it tells you to modify a movement and you do, then if it's wrong you could be putting yourself at risk. But that's the same with any gym trainer or workout app – you'll still need to listen to your body alongside this guidance.
At this testing phase, the app felt unfinished. Some guidance was from different voices – one sounding very low quality and with a different accent, which was confusing.
Some feedback also left me a bit baffled. On one plank workout I was told to not hang my head too low, but also to not lift my head too high. Whilst a mid-way hold makes sense, I think I was likely only looking around a bit – something that promotes movement which can be helpful.
The repetition of recommended movements during the AI-constructed workouts was another sticking point. On a general guided workout, I repeated moves a lot. This is likely where future updates could equip a microphone to allow a back-and-forth with the onboard LLM, and allow you to verbally adjust workouts to suit your needs. This could be a real game changer for future use.
Verdict
(Image credit: Future)
The BodyPark Atom is an affordable way to get some of the best features of a personal trainer, and a fitness guidance app, without the outlay up front. It offers feedback which is largely accurate and certainly far better than any of the competition, thanks to its hardware.
While the software still needs some evolution, at time of publishing this is a fantastic idea that's been well-developed to offer a smart guidance and feedback system that uses AI to map your body.
from Latest from TechRadar https://ift.tt/DG0rQOk
Watch Match of the Day for free on BBC iPlayer (...
Following on from 2025/26, Match of the Day will continue to be fronted by a trio of presenters in Mark Chapman, Kelly Cates and Gabby Logan for the Premier League 2026/27.
Beyond the presenters, there has also been a shake-up in the punditry line-up, with Dion Dublin, Martin Keown, Nedum Onuoha, Theo Walcott, Shay Given and Stephen Warnock all departing. But don't worry, the BBC already have their replacements lined up, with former Tottenham players Toby Alderweireld and Robbie Keane joining the team, alongside Thomas Frank, who was Spurs' manager at the beginning of last season. Ashley Young has also joined following his retirement.
MOTD is a godsend for footy fans who don't have access to live TV broadcasts from the likes of Sky Sports and TNT Sports. It neatly rounds up all the highlights of the day's Premier League action every Saturday night, with a sister show, Match of the Day 2, providing the same service on Sundays. Don't forget about the Champions League version of Match of the Day which joined the collection back in 2024.
Here's how to watch Match of the Day online and on TV from anywhere in the world, for free.
How to watch Match of the Day in the UK for free
Match of the Day is free-to-air on BBC One in the UK. It goes out live on Saturday nights roughly at 10:20pm BST, with Match of the Day 2 following on the same channel around the same time the next day.
There is also a continued addition to the BBC's football highlights portfolio this season, with Match of the Day: Champions League streaming every Wednesday following a matchday.
If you miss an episode, or simply prefer to watch it on a portable device, don't worry. Every Match of the Day episode is also available on BBC iPlayer.
Just keep in mind that each episode is only available to stream until the next episode airs, or for seven days after broadcast, whichever comes first.
To watch BBC iPlayer: Visit the BBC iPlayer website or download the apps (iOS/Android).
BBC iPlayer is FREE,but you will need to create an account, have a valid U.K. postcode (e.g. SE1 7PB) and a TV license.
If you're keen to watch Match of the Day but you're away from the UK and access to the show is geo-blocked, then you could use a VPN to access it (assuming you're not breaching any broadcaster T&Cs, of course). You may be surprised by how simple it is to do. Plus, we have a great 75% discount on our #1 VPN...
Not having a VPN is like leaving your front door wide open in a busy city – anyone can walk right in and take a peek.
TechRadar regularly reviews all the biggest and best VPN providers and NordVPN is our #1 choice
✅ Up to 75% Off Today ✅ 3 Extra Months Free ✅ Unlocks BBC iPlayer
Get NordVPN and stream Match of the Day online now – from US, Canada, Europe, etc.VIEW DEAL ON
How to watch BBC iPlayer with a VPN
Using a VPN to unblock Match of the Day is very straightforward. Just follow these steps:
1. Download and install a VPN: As we say, our top choice is NordVPN.
2. Connect to the appropriate server location: Open the VPN app, hit 'choose location' and select your home geographical location (anywhere in the UK).
3. Go to the broadcaster's live stream: In this case, just head to BBC iPlayer.
What devices can I watch BBC iPlayer on?
Amazon Fire (Tablets, Cube, Stick, TVs)
Android TV (please note: some models aren’t supported)
Android (Mobile & Tablet) - Android 7.0 and above
Apple TV (tvOS 14 or later)
Google TV (Chromecast with Google TV and NVIDIA Shield)
Freely
Freesat (please note: some models aren’t supported)
Freeview Play (TVs and set-top boxes) (some models aren’t supported)
iOS (iPhone & iPad) - iOS 14 and above
LG Smart TVs (2016-2024)
NOW Smart Sticks and Boxes (minimum firmware v11.5.0)
PlayStation (PS4 and PS5)
Roku (Stick & Roku-OS powered TVs, minimum firmware v11.5.0)
Samsung Smart TVs (2017 and above)
Sky Q, Sky Glass and Sky Stream puck
Virgin Media (360, Stream, TiVo)
YouView (BT, Humax, Sony, TalkTalk)
Xbox (One, Series X, Series S)
Can I watch Match of the Day online in the US, Canada, Australia, and worldwide?
Since Match of the Day is exclusive to BBC iPlayer and BBC One in the UK, it's not currently available to stream in any international locations.
If you're a Brit traveling abroad, you can usethis VPN to watch your usual streaming services from anywhere in the world.
Note: Not all VPNs work for this, but NordVPN does. It's also great for privacy and comes with a 30-day risk-free trial.
We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example:1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service).2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad.We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.
from Latest from TechRadar https://ift.tt/4Fu39Hj
For organizations looking to gain an edge by adop...
For organizations looking to gain an edge by adopting AI tools, the decision has been dominated between large language models.
Every new release promises better reasoning, greater accuracy and more capabilities than the last.
But as foundation models become increasingly powerful and widely available, the real differentiator for organizations won't be which model they choose - it will be how effectively they deploy agentic AI to solve real business problems.
At the recent 2026 Gartner Data and Analytics Summit, the message from analysts was clear; standalone AI models are outdated and autonomous, interconnected AI agents are the future. But to get real value from agentic AI, IT leaders should prioritize “high-frequency, low-complexity use cases, apply guardrails and upskill the workforce.”
To this statement, I would add that the next phase of enterprise AI isn't about having access to the biggest model. It's about building better agents.
That means moving beyond seeing AI as simply another chatbot and instead treating it as an operational capability that can augment employees, automate repetitive work and unlock efficiencies throughout the organization.
The biggest AI opportunity isn't conversational
For many people, AI still means asking ChatGPT a question and receiving an answer. That's certainly one application, and conversational interfaces have played an important role in making AI accessible. But that’s only scratching the surface of what's possible.
Some of the most valuable agentic AI deployments are focused on operational work rather than conversation. For example, in higher education, AI agents are helping students navigate support services by answering routine questions about enrolment, campus facilities or administrative processes, freeing staff to deal with more complex issues.
In transport, agents can combine timetable information, onward travel options and customer support into a single interaction, saving users from having to search across multiple services.
Elsewhere, organizations are using AI agents to qualify sales enquiries, summarize complex documentation, and extract information from contracts. Tasks that previously required hours of manual effort.
The common thread isn't simply that these agents can answer questions. It's that they remove administrative burden and enable people to focus on work that requires judgement, expertise and human interaction.
Better agents start with better problems
One of the biggest misconceptions surrounding agentic AI is that organizations should begin by deciding where they want an AI agent.
In reality, for organizations looking to develop their AI offering, the first question shouldn't be, "Where can we deploy AI?" It should be, "What business problem are we trying to solve?"
Starting with technology often leads organizations to build agents that deliver little value because they're automating the wrong process. The organizations seeing the strongest returns are those identifying operational pain points first, in areas where employees spend large amounts of time on repetitive administration, searching for information or manually moving data between systems.
When those challenges are clearly understood, agentic AI becomes an effective operational tool rather than technology looking for a use case.
The model is becoming less important than the implementation
Today's leading AI models are improving at an extraordinary pace. They're becoming more capable, faster and increasingly cost-effective which means that the competitive advantage is shifting
Organizations are unlikely to outperform competitors simply because they've selected one foundation model over another. Instead, success will increasingly depend on everything that surrounds the model.
Data quality is one of the biggest differentiators. An AI agent is only as good as the information it's grounded on. Contradictory documentation, inconsistent policies, or poor knowledge management inevitably reduce the quality of outputs.
Prompt engineering is another often overlooked capability. Designing an agent isn't simply a matter of giving it instructions and expecting consistent results. Well-designed prompts establish clear guardrails, define the agent's responsibilities and ensure it stays focused on its intended purpose.
The same is true of governance. A good agent shouldn't answer every question it's asked. It should understand its role, know when to decline requests that fall outside its remit and operate only with the information and permissions it genuinely needs. Applying the principle of least privilege isn't just good security practice, it also improves efficiency by reducing unnecessary processing and keeps costs under control.
Ultimately, the quality of the implementation matters far more than the size of the underlying model.
Trust is built through iteration, not ambition
Another common mistake is assuming that agentic AI should be deployed through large-scale transformation programs. But, in practice, the opposite is usually true.
The organizations achieving meaningful outcomes tend to start with a tightly defined use case that delivers measurable value. This creates confidence among employees, demonstrates return on investment, and provides an opportunity to refine governance before expanding into more sophisticated workflows.
Agentic AI should be treated as a product that evolves over time rather than a project that's complete on launch day. However, that also changes the way organizations approach testing.
Traditional software is designed to deliver identical outputs every time. AI agents are probabilistic by nature, meaning consistency becomes just as important as functionality. Continuous testing, monitoring, and refinement therefore become integral to successful deployment.
Just as importantly, employees need to be part of the journey. Building trust isn't about unveiling an AI agent once it has been completed. It's about involving teams throughout development, helping them understand how decisions are made, where guardrails exist and how the technology is intended to augment and not replace their expertise.
Better agents will define the next phase of AI
It’s inevitable that the AI industry will continue producing faster, cheaper and more capable foundation models. But what isn't inevitable is whether organisations will be able to translate those capabilities into meaningful business value.
The next AI race won't be won by those with access to the biggest model. It will be won by those that build trusted, well-governed agents capable of solving real operational problems.
This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.
The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit
from Latest from TechRadar https://ift.tt/TRBev2C
Premier League 2026/27: Fri, Aug 21, 2026 – Sun, ...
Watch Premier League 2026/27 live streams as Arsenal begin the season as champions for the first time in 22 years, having ended their drought last term. The Gunners are aiming to become the first club not called Manchester City to retain the title since 2009, but several sides will believe they can knock them off their perch.
Three of the expected front-runners are under new management, with Enzo Maresca tasked with following Pep Guardiola at Manchester City, Andoni Iraola replacing Arne Slot at Liverpool and Xabi Alonso becoming the latest in a long line of head coaches at Chelsea. The two other clubs in the 'Big Six' are led by bosses who enjoyed strong finishes to last season, albeit at different ends of the table, with Michael Carrick getting the Manchester United job full-time and Roberto De Zerbi aiming to kick on from his successful survival mission at Tottenham Hotspur.
Aston Villa look strong again under Unai Emery after winning the Europa League last term, but Newcastle United have lost several key players and long-serving manager Eddie Howe, with Matthias Jaissle coming in. Bournemouth, Brighton and Brentford will aim to continue punching above their weight, as the Cherries embark on their first-ever European campaign under new boss Marco Rose, who replaced Iraola. Elsewhere, Crystal Palace hired former Lens manager Pierre Sage after Oliver Glasner left for Nottingham Forest, while Álvaro Arbeloa has swapped Real Madrid for Fulham.
Everton will hope to kick on from their first campaign at Hill Dickinson Stadium, while there is a buzz at Sunderland after they qualified for Europe in their first season back in the top flight. Leeds United's mission will be to stay well clear of the relegation zone, which could be a tall order for promoted trio Coventry City, Ipswich Town and Hull City.
It is set up to be a cracking season - here's where to watch Premier League 2026/27 live streams online from anywhere.
Premier League Fixtures & Broadcast Info: Matchday 1
All times BST
Friday 21 August
8pm — Arsenal vs Coventry: Sky Sports (UK) | USA Network (US)
Saturday 22 August
12:30pm — Hull vs Man Utd: TNT Sports (UK) | USA Network (US) 3pm — Everton vs Crystal Palace: N/A (UK) | USA Network (US) 3pm — Ipswich vs Sunderland: N/A (UK) | NBCSN/Peacock (US) 3pm — Nottm Forest vs Leeds: N/A (UK) | NBCSN/Peacock (US) 5:30pm — Brentford vs Tottenham: Sky Sports (UK) | NBC/Peacock (US)
Sunday 23 August
2pm — Brighton vs Aston Villa: Sky Sports (UK) | NBCSN/Peacock (US) 2pm — Man City vs Bournemouth: Sky Sports (UK) | USA Network (US) 4:30pm — Newcastle vs Liverpool: Sky Sports (UK) | USA Network (US)
Monday 24 August
8pm — Fulham vs Chelsea: Sky Sports (UK) | USA Network (US)
Watch the Premier League for free
Free Premier League 2026/27 streams are scarce but there are a couple of options.
Fans in Brazil can also watch select Premier League games completely free on CazéTV's YouTube channel.
Not in Brazil or the US? You need a VPN to unlock your FREE stream — find out more below.
Use a VPN to watch any Premier League 2026/27 stream
Chances are you'll find yourself overseas when some Premier League 2026/27 games are taking place, but does that mean you have to miss the action? No, it doesn't... a VPN will ensure you get your coverage from anywhere.
Premier League live streams are geo-restricted on all streaming services, but a VPN (Virtual Private Network) is a neat way around this, unpicking the geo-locks by altering your device's digital location. It's great for accessing your usual streaming services while on the move, and it does wonders for your internet security, too.
We rate NordVPN as the best VPN — more details below.
🥇 World's best VPN service 💰 75% off right now 🆓 3 months extra free
Get your VPN and stream the Premier League 2026/27 from anywhere in the world.View Deal
How to watch Premier League 2026/27 live streams in the US
NBC Universal has the rights to show the Premier League live in the US with all 380 matches across flagship channel NBC, Peacock and cable TV channel USA Network.
Peacock shows roughly half of the Premier League matches every week, with plans starting from $12.99 a month, or $129.99 a year.
There is no dedicated streaming platform for USA Network, but it is available on cord-cutters like YouTube TV, Hulu + Live TV, DirecTV Streamand Sling(select markets), many of which carry free trials. You can also get NBC and NBCSN on these cord-cutters.
Outside the US during the Premier League season? Use NordVPN to access your usual streams.
How to watch Premier League 2026/27 live streams in the UK
Sky Sports is the home of the Premier League in the UK, with at least 215 matches broadcast exclusively live across the season. Sky Sports packages cost £35 per month for new customers, or £22 per month if you already have a new 24-month Sky TV contract.
A further 52 games will be live on TNT Sports and its streaming partner HBO Max. A subscription costs £30.99 per month on a rolling monthly contract, or £25.99 per month for a minimum 12-month term.
And, don't forget that Match of the Day will continue for 2026/27 with extended highlight packages every Saturday and Sunday on BBC One.
If you're traveling outside the UK during the season, make sure you use NordVPN to tap into your home streams.
How to watch Premier League 2026/27 live streams in Australia
(Image credit: Other)
In Australia, Stan Sport has the rights to show every single Premier League game across the 2026/27 season.
Better still, it's now even cheaper to watch Down Under because Stan have introduced a new Basic tier with ads at AU$9.99. You'll also need the AU$20 Sport add-on, but you get every Premier League game, plus the Champions League, FA Cup, and more, all for AU$29.99 a month.
Abroad? You can use a NordVPN (try 100% risk-free) to watch all the action free of charge as if you were right at home.
Official Premier League 2026/27 broadcasters by region
Africa
Click to see more Premier League 2026/27 streams▼
The Premier League 2026/27 broadcast rights for Africa are largely split between BeIn SPORTS and SuperSport.
Residents in the Middle East and North Africa can watch Premier League 2026/27 live streams with a BeIn SPORTS subscription, while Satellite TV provider SuperSport has the Premier League TV rights across these regions in Africa:
Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, São Tomé and Príncipe, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, St Helena and Ascension, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe.
South Africa
SuperSport will host the Premier League 2026/27 on its satellite channels.
Americas
Click to see more Premier League 2026/27 streams▼
Canada
Fubo once again has the rights to broadcast the Premier League during the 2026/27 season.
Latin America
A combination of FOX and TNT Sports will show Premier League action in 2026/27 across the following regions in Latin America:
Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua and Panama.
Latin America
South American countries – including Brazil – will be able to watch live Premier League 2026/27 matches on ESPN, which also holds the rights in the Caribbean.
Remember, you can also watch one match per gameweek completely free on CazéTV's YouTube channel in Brazil.
Europe
Click to see more Premier League 2026/27 streams▼
The Premier League 2026/27 season will be shown by various broadcasters and streaming services throughout Europe. You can check out specific information about your country below.
Albania
Digitalb has the rights to show Premier League action this season.
Andorra
Soccer fans in Andorra can watch the action on a combination of CANAL+ and DAZN.
Armenia, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Romania
Premier League coverage comes from Saran Media channels in these countries.
Austria
Sky in Austria will show coverage of the Premier League in 2026/27.
Belgium
Telenet will broadcast the Premier League 2026/27 in Belgium.
Croatia, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia and Slovenia
You can watch the Premier League 2026/27 season on Arena Sport in these counties.
Cyprus
You can view the Premier League 2026/27 on Cytavision in Cyprus.
Czechia, Luxembourg, Poland and Slovakia
The Premier League 2026/27 season will be shown on CANAL+ in these territories.
Denmark, Finland, Netherlands, Norway and Sweden
Fans in these countries can watch the Premier League 2026/27 on Viaplay.
Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania
TV3 has the Premier League live stream rights in these countries this season.
France
There will be coverage of Premier League 2026/27 in France on CANAL+.
Germany
In Germany, the Premier League 2026/27 rights are owned by Sky.
Greece
Greeks should head to IMG and Nova for the Premier League 2026/27 season.
Hungary
Premier League 2026/27 live streams will go out on TV2 in Hungary.
Iceland
Syn is the place to watch Premier League football in Iceland.
Ireland
Premier Sports, TNT Sports and Sky Sports will broadcast coverage of the Premier League 2026/27 in Ireland.
Israel
Charlton has won the Premier League coverage rights in Israel.
Italy
Viewers in Italy can watch the Premier League 2026/27 on Sky Italia.
Malta
Maltese soccer fans will be able to watch Premier League action on TSN.
Portugal and Spain
DAZN has the rights to air the Premier League 2026/27 in Portugal and Spain.
Switzerland
Fans in Switzerland can watch the Premier League 2026/27 on CANAL+ for French language commentary, or Sky for German and Italian commentary.
Turkey
BeIn SPORTS in Turkey will host some coverage of the Premier League 2026/27.
Ukraine
Setanta Sports will show the Premier League 2026/27 in Ukraine.
Asia
Click to see more Premier League 2026/27 streams▼
Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan
The Premier League 2026/27 rights for these Central Asian countries are held by Saran Media.
Cambodia, Laos, and Thailand
Make your way to Jasmine if you want to watch the Premier League 2026/27 in these three countries.
China
In China, the Premier League 2026/27 will be shown by Migu.
Chinese Taipei
ELTA is the current Premier League rights holder here.
Hong Kong
PCCW is the place to go for the Premier League 2026/27 in Hong Kong.
India, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka
Star Sports (and the JioStar app) is the Premier League 2026/27 broadcaster for India plus Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.
Indonesia
Head to EMTEK channels in Indonesia for the rights to the Premier League 2026/27.
Japan
U-NEXT will show the Premier League 2026/27 in Japan.
Malaysia
Astro is the home of the Premier League 2026/27 in the Malaysia.
Mongolia
Unitel will show the coverage of the Premier League 2026/27 in Mongolia.
Singapore
StarHub provides coverage of the Premier League 2026/27 in Singapore.
South Korea
Coverage of the Premier League 2026/27 in South Korea can be found at Coupang.
Vietnam
Mono is the Premier League rights holder in Vietnam this season.
Oceania
Click to see more Premier League 2026/27 streams▼
Australia
As detailed above, Stan Sport has the rights to the Premier League 2026/27 in Australia.
New Zealand
Sky Sport is the Premier League 2026/27 TV rights holder in New Zealand.
Pacific Islands
Coverage in the Pacific Islands comes from Digicel. That covers:
BeIN Sports MENA is the Premier League 2026/27 broadcaster across the Middle East.
You can watch the Premier League 2026/27 live streams with a subscription to BeIN SPORTS in the following Middle East countries:
Bahrain, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, United Arab Emirates and Yemen.
When does the Premier League 2026/27 season start?
The Premier League 2026/27 season kicks off on Friday, August 21, with the final day of the campaign on Sunday, May 30.
Can I watch Premier League 2026/27 on my mobile?
Of course, most broadcasters have streaming services that you can access through mobile apps or via your phone's browser. For example, Sky Go in the UK.
We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example:1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service).2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad.We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.
Follow Us
Were this world an endless plain, and by sailing eastward we could for ever reach new distances