Watch Hull vs Man Utd live streams as the Tigers face a huge test in their first game back in the Premier League against a United side looking to build on a hugely impressive run under now-permanent manager Michael Carrick.
Back in the top flight for the first time since suffering relegation in 2017, Hull surprised many last season by defying a transfer embargo and overcoming Middlesbrough in the play-off final. They’ll start the new campaign as relegation candidates but have significantly improved the squad over the summer, with talented Aussie centre-back Luca Herrington the pick of the signings. However, goals could be an issue, having found the net just once in their final three friendlies.
After a nightmare spell under Ruben Amorim, United fans will feel they are back on the right track with Carrick at the helm. The 45-year-old lost just two of his 17 games as caretaker manager and, having been handed the job full-time, has strengthened the squad with the additions of Andrey Santos and Youri Tielemans. Yet it is the form in pre-season of Bryan Mbeumo and Amad Diallo that has supporters excited, as both attackers look razor sharp and will be relishing the trip to the MKM Stadium.
Read on for our dedicated guide on how to stream Hull vs Man Utd in the Premier League, live and from anywhere in the world.
Can I watch Hull vs Man Utd for free?
Hull vs Man Utd isn't technically available for free anywhere; however, there is a way for viewers in the US to watch at no cost.
US coverage is live on USA Network, which can be accessed via YouTube TV, Hulu + Live TV and DirecTV Stream and all have free trials of varying lengths for new customers.
Not in the US? Use NordVPN to access your USA Network stream – more details below.
Hull vs Man Utd team news
TBC
Use a VPN to watch Hull vs Man Utd from anywhere
A VPN is a handy piece of software that can make your device appear as if it's back in your home country, thereby letting you unlock your usual streaming service. The best VPN right now? We recommend NordVPN – it does everything and comes with a 75% discount.
Not having a VPN is like leaving your front door wide open in a busy city – anyone can walk right in and take a peek.
TechRadar regularly reviews all the biggest and best VPN providers and NordVPN is our #1 choice.
✅ Up to 75% off today ✅ 3 extra months free ✅ Unlocks YouTube TV
Get NordVPN and stream Hull vs Man Utd from anywhere.View Deal
It's really straightforward to use a VPN to watch Hull vs Man Utd.
1. Install the VPN of your choice. As we've said, NordVPN is our favorite.
2. Choose the location you wish to connect to in the VPN app. For example, if you want to watch the TNT Sports via HBO Max stream, select 'United Kingdom' from the listed countries.
3. Sit back and enjoy the action. Head to HBO Max and tune into Hull vs Man Utd.
How to watch Hull vs Man Utd live streams in the US
Hull vs Man Utd will be shown on USA Network in the US.
USA Network is part of NBC Universal, which holds the Premier League broadcast rights in the US.
Outside the US this Saturday? Use NordVPN to unlock your stream of the game.
How to watch Hull vs Man Utd live streams in the UK
Fans in the UK can watch Hull vs Man Utd on TNT Sports.
The game will be live on TNT Sports 1 and via its streaming partner HBO Max. A subscription costs £30.99 per month on a rolling monthly contract, or £25.99 per month for a minimum 12-month term.
Not in the UK right now? Use NordVPN to watch Hull vs Man Utd on HBO Max.
How to watch Hull vs Man Utd live streams in Canada
Fubo is the Premier League's broadcast partner in Canada and has live coverage of Hull vs Man Utd.
Prices start from CA$31.49 per month for Fubo's Sports Monthly package. You can also watch Fubo's content if you have a selected DAZN subscription in Canada.
Traveling away from Canada? Use NordVPN to access your Premier League live streams from anywhere in the world.
How to watch Hull vs Man Utd live streams in Australia
Hull vs Man Utd will be broadcast on Stan Sport in Australia.
Stan Sport will show all 380 Premier League games, with prices starting at A$29.99/month. This includes a basic Stan plan (A$9.99) and the Sports add-on (A$20).
Missing the game because you're outside Australia?Use a VPN to login to your Stan Sport account.
What is the Hull vs Man Utd start time?
Hull vs Man Utd kicks off at 4.30am PT / 7.30am ET / 12.30pm BST / 9.30pm AEST on Saturday, August 22.
Can I watch Hull vs Man Utd on my mobile?
Of course, most broadcasters have streaming services that you can access through mobile apps or via your phone's browser.
You can also stay up-to-date with all the key Premier League 2026/27 moments on the official social media channels on Instagram (@PremierLeague), TikTok (@PremierLeague) and YouTube (@PremierLeague).
We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example:1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service).2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad.We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.
from Latest from TechRadar https://ift.tt/rNsdmTh
I agreed to test the BodyPark Atom, which aims to...
I agreed to test the BodyPark Atom, which aims to offer the best bits of personal trainer technique feedback, without any of the drawbacks. A small smart speaker-like unit with an AI-powered, body-mapping camera on top, it offers real-time feedback on your movements, plus guided sessions to be completed as part of a larger workout plan. It's magnetized too, so you can take it to the gym and stick it to a squat rack should you need form-correction outside of the home. Workouts and plans can be constructed for you, or you can edit them yourself in the app.
It might look like Star Wars' BB8, but the idea here is to help you dodge the costs of a trainer — and the location and time constraints — by putting some of the best bits into a digital assistant, which uses AI to provide feedback on technique as well as structure workout plans. That means a device that can watch your technique, count reps, and offer feedback to help you improve.
That all sounds great, but I went into testing with a skeptical mindset, having seen how AI can miss the mark entirely when it comes to designing workouts. While the promise of AI is exciting, the reality often isn't so impressive. That was what I came away feeling about the BodyPark Atom, which is helpful and certainly can push newcomers things in the right direction, but is also still a pretty new and developing technology with its own teething issues.
All that said, I would still recommend one of these for anyone looking to improve exercise, avoid injury or progress training plateaus in a novel, fun and affordable way.
Fully equipped
(Image credit: Future)
My usual training involves a gym session twice a week, some boxing, and cardio in the form of either a long run or maybe a long gravel bike ride. I incorporate a dash of swimming, paddle boarding or surfing when possible.
Being able to do a HIIT class, in my kitchen, was a real treat It meant I saved time on doing it at home, I was able to control my environment for comfort, and I could use my own kit like mats and dumbbells as needed. While you can get a thousand different HIIT classes from the likes of YouTube, the BodyPark offers guidance and coaching that static videos don't.
Your form is watched with the 1/2.8-inch CMOS sensor toting and 720p video capturing camera. This maps 34 body key points for over 1,000 exercises recognised (a little like this 3DAT AI fitness coach we tested a couple of years ago), and the AI assistant's live voice coach offers feedback during the movements, ensuring your execution of the move is correct.
The field of view is also massive, 160 degrees horizontal and vertical, meaning even with limited space it's possible to be seen clearly and still get tracked accurately. This is nice in the gym, where you might want to use the device's onboard magnet to attach this to the squat rack as you lift, without getting in anyone's way.
The screen shows the workout you're going to do, although that was often an image and not always a video. This isn't ideal if you're new to a movement and then have to pause the workout to go look up on your phone what to do. Although watching yourself is pretty clear and reading your rep count is too on that 326ppi 1.43-inch AMOLED screen.
You can always watch back your videos and guidance given, from within the app using your phone. This collates all your metrics so you can monitor progress, plan future sessions and generally check-in on how you're doing at any point. Prices start at $219 / £199 / AU$330.
What I loved
(Image credit: Future)
Not having to count your reps really is a fantastic feeling. As someone who generally trains solo, in the gym at least, that mental counting clock has always been on for me. Using a smartwatch always ends up fiddling with buttons or editing incorrect rep counts. Turning that mental load off left me with a bit more bandwidth to focus on my movements and pay attention to the Atom's guidance tips, in a way I hadn't realised was being restricted by the counting focus.
The movement tracking and feedback is also one of the most impressive parts of this setup. Thanks to the 32 points of tracking – all shown on screen – I was able to trust that the device was mapping me accurately and therefore, the advice given was actually helpful.
Even in the few cases it wasn't exact – like telling me to squat lower when I could see I was at 90-degrees – this still forced me to focus on my movement, so during future lifts I was posture-aware. Even if the advice isn't perfect every time, it gets you thinking internally in a way that will help train you to self-correct in the long run.
For squat and deadlift correction, where technique can really make all the difference to progress, this worked fantastically. As mentioned, you can magnetically attach it to the rack at the gym. Even with movements from others in the gym, or lighting troubles, this performs really well so you just attach and start without worry.
The battery life is also pretty great at 72 hours recording time. That meant I could use this all week, and beyond, without needing to even think about charging it back up. The charger is USB-C.
The company claims the Atom offers a 96% body tracking accuracy rate and, in my experience, that feels about right. Rep counting was 100% accurate, which left me with a fair amount of confidence in the device. In reality it was the infancy of the software that proved more challenging,
What I didn't love
(Image credit: Future)
At this price, it's tough to complain about what is essentially a personal trainer and selection of workout classes rolled into one. You're probably getting thousands of dollars or pounds of value.
That said, there is room for improvement. Hardware is superb and I struggle to find fault, but on the software side, I'd like a bit more reassurance. This is a device that you are essentially entrusting a lot of your bodily health with. If it tells you to modify a movement and you do, then if it's wrong you could be putting yourself at risk. But that's the same with any gym trainer or workout app – you'll still need to listen to your body alongside this guidance.
At this testing phase, the app felt unfinished. Some guidance was from different voices – one sounding very low quality and with a different accent, which was confusing.
Some feedback also left me a bit baffled. On one plank workout I was told to not hang my head too low, but also to not lift my head too high. Whilst a mid-way hold makes sense, I think I was likely only looking around a bit – something that promotes movement which can be helpful.
The repetition of recommended movements during the AI-constructed workouts was another sticking point. On a general guided workout, I repeated moves a lot. This is likely where future updates could equip a microphone to allow a back-and-forth with the onboard LLM, and allow you to verbally adjust workouts to suit your needs. This could be a real game changer for future use.
Verdict
(Image credit: Future)
The BodyPark Atom is an affordable way to get some of the best features of a personal trainer, and a fitness guidance app, without the outlay up front. It offers feedback which is largely accurate and certainly far better than any of the competition, thanks to its hardware.
While the software still needs some evolution, at time of publishing this is a fantastic idea that's been well-developed to offer a smart guidance and feedback system that uses AI to map your body.
from Latest from TechRadar https://ift.tt/DG0rQOk
Watch Match of the Day for free on BBC iPlayer (...
Following on from 2025/26, Match of the Day will continue to be fronted by a trio of presenters in Mark Chapman, Kelly Cates and Gabby Logan for the Premier League 2026/27.
Beyond the presenters, there has also been a shake-up in the punditry line-up, with Dion Dublin, Martin Keown, Nedum Onuoha, Theo Walcott, Shay Given and Stephen Warnock all departing. But don't worry, the BBC already have their replacements lined up, with former Tottenham players Toby Alderweireld and Robbie Keane joining the team, alongside Thomas Frank, who was Spurs' manager at the beginning of last season. Ashley Young has also joined following his retirement.
MOTD is a godsend for footy fans who don't have access to live TV broadcasts from the likes of Sky Sports and TNT Sports. It neatly rounds up all the highlights of the day's Premier League action every Saturday night, with a sister show, Match of the Day 2, providing the same service on Sundays. Don't forget about the Champions League version of Match of the Day which joined the collection back in 2024.
Here's how to watch Match of the Day online and on TV from anywhere in the world, for free.
How to watch Match of the Day in the UK for free
Match of the Day is free-to-air on BBC One in the UK. It goes out live on Saturday nights roughly at 10:20pm BST, with Match of the Day 2 following on the same channel around the same time the next day.
There is also a continued addition to the BBC's football highlights portfolio this season, with Match of the Day: Champions League streaming every Wednesday following a matchday.
If you miss an episode, or simply prefer to watch it on a portable device, don't worry. Every Match of the Day episode is also available on BBC iPlayer.
Just keep in mind that each episode is only available to stream until the next episode airs, or for seven days after broadcast, whichever comes first.
To watch BBC iPlayer: Visit the BBC iPlayer website or download the apps (iOS/Android).
BBC iPlayer is FREE,but you will need to create an account, have a valid U.K. postcode (e.g. SE1 7PB) and a TV license.
If you're keen to watch Match of the Day but you're away from the UK and access to the show is geo-blocked, then you could use a VPN to access it (assuming you're not breaching any broadcaster T&Cs, of course). You may be surprised by how simple it is to do. Plus, we have a great 75% discount on our #1 VPN...
Not having a VPN is like leaving your front door wide open in a busy city – anyone can walk right in and take a peek.
TechRadar regularly reviews all the biggest and best VPN providers and NordVPN is our #1 choice
✅ Up to 75% Off Today ✅ 3 Extra Months Free ✅ Unlocks BBC iPlayer
Get NordVPN and stream Match of the Day online now – from US, Canada, Europe, etc.VIEW DEAL ON
How to watch BBC iPlayer with a VPN
Using a VPN to unblock Match of the Day is very straightforward. Just follow these steps:
1. Download and install a VPN: As we say, our top choice is NordVPN.
2. Connect to the appropriate server location: Open the VPN app, hit 'choose location' and select your home geographical location (anywhere in the UK).
3. Go to the broadcaster's live stream: In this case, just head to BBC iPlayer.
What devices can I watch BBC iPlayer on?
Amazon Fire (Tablets, Cube, Stick, TVs)
Android TV (please note: some models aren’t supported)
Android (Mobile & Tablet) - Android 7.0 and above
Apple TV (tvOS 14 or later)
Google TV (Chromecast with Google TV and NVIDIA Shield)
Freely
Freesat (please note: some models aren’t supported)
Freeview Play (TVs and set-top boxes) (some models aren’t supported)
iOS (iPhone & iPad) - iOS 14 and above
LG Smart TVs (2016-2024)
NOW Smart Sticks and Boxes (minimum firmware v11.5.0)
PlayStation (PS4 and PS5)
Roku (Stick & Roku-OS powered TVs, minimum firmware v11.5.0)
Samsung Smart TVs (2017 and above)
Sky Q, Sky Glass and Sky Stream puck
Virgin Media (360, Stream, TiVo)
YouView (BT, Humax, Sony, TalkTalk)
Xbox (One, Series X, Series S)
Can I watch Match of the Day online in the US, Canada, Australia, and worldwide?
Since Match of the Day is exclusive to BBC iPlayer and BBC One in the UK, it's not currently available to stream in any international locations.
If you're a Brit traveling abroad, you can usethis VPN to watch your usual streaming services from anywhere in the world.
Note: Not all VPNs work for this, but NordVPN does. It's also great for privacy and comes with a 30-day risk-free trial.
We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example:1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service).2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad.We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.
from Latest from TechRadar https://ift.tt/4Fu39Hj
For organizations looking to gain an edge by adop...
For organizations looking to gain an edge by adopting AI tools, the decision has been dominated between large language models.
Every new release promises better reasoning, greater accuracy and more capabilities than the last.
But as foundation models become increasingly powerful and widely available, the real differentiator for organizations won't be which model they choose - it will be how effectively they deploy agentic AI to solve real business problems.
At the recent 2026 Gartner Data and Analytics Summit, the message from analysts was clear; standalone AI models are outdated and autonomous, interconnected AI agents are the future. But to get real value from agentic AI, IT leaders should prioritize “high-frequency, low-complexity use cases, apply guardrails and upskill the workforce.”
To this statement, I would add that the next phase of enterprise AI isn't about having access to the biggest model. It's about building better agents.
That means moving beyond seeing AI as simply another chatbot and instead treating it as an operational capability that can augment employees, automate repetitive work and unlock efficiencies throughout the organization.
The biggest AI opportunity isn't conversational
For many people, AI still means asking ChatGPT a question and receiving an answer. That's certainly one application, and conversational interfaces have played an important role in making AI accessible. But that’s only scratching the surface of what's possible.
Some of the most valuable agentic AI deployments are focused on operational work rather than conversation. For example, in higher education, AI agents are helping students navigate support services by answering routine questions about enrolment, campus facilities or administrative processes, freeing staff to deal with more complex issues.
In transport, agents can combine timetable information, onward travel options and customer support into a single interaction, saving users from having to search across multiple services.
Elsewhere, organizations are using AI agents to qualify sales enquiries, summarize complex documentation, and extract information from contracts. Tasks that previously required hours of manual effort.
The common thread isn't simply that these agents can answer questions. It's that they remove administrative burden and enable people to focus on work that requires judgement, expertise and human interaction.
Better agents start with better problems
One of the biggest misconceptions surrounding agentic AI is that organizations should begin by deciding where they want an AI agent.
In reality, for organizations looking to develop their AI offering, the first question shouldn't be, "Where can we deploy AI?" It should be, "What business problem are we trying to solve?"
Starting with technology often leads organizations to build agents that deliver little value because they're automating the wrong process. The organizations seeing the strongest returns are those identifying operational pain points first, in areas where employees spend large amounts of time on repetitive administration, searching for information or manually moving data between systems.
When those challenges are clearly understood, agentic AI becomes an effective operational tool rather than technology looking for a use case.
The model is becoming less important than the implementation
Today's leading AI models are improving at an extraordinary pace. They're becoming more capable, faster and increasingly cost-effective which means that the competitive advantage is shifting
Organizations are unlikely to outperform competitors simply because they've selected one foundation model over another. Instead, success will increasingly depend on everything that surrounds the model.
Data quality is one of the biggest differentiators. An AI agent is only as good as the information it's grounded on. Contradictory documentation, inconsistent policies, or poor knowledge management inevitably reduce the quality of outputs.
Prompt engineering is another often overlooked capability. Designing an agent isn't simply a matter of giving it instructions and expecting consistent results. Well-designed prompts establish clear guardrails, define the agent's responsibilities and ensure it stays focused on its intended purpose.
The same is true of governance. A good agent shouldn't answer every question it's asked. It should understand its role, know when to decline requests that fall outside its remit and operate only with the information and permissions it genuinely needs. Applying the principle of least privilege isn't just good security practice, it also improves efficiency by reducing unnecessary processing and keeps costs under control.
Ultimately, the quality of the implementation matters far more than the size of the underlying model.
Trust is built through iteration, not ambition
Another common mistake is assuming that agentic AI should be deployed through large-scale transformation programs. But, in practice, the opposite is usually true.
The organizations achieving meaningful outcomes tend to start with a tightly defined use case that delivers measurable value. This creates confidence among employees, demonstrates return on investment, and provides an opportunity to refine governance before expanding into more sophisticated workflows.
Agentic AI should be treated as a product that evolves over time rather than a project that's complete on launch day. However, that also changes the way organizations approach testing.
Traditional software is designed to deliver identical outputs every time. AI agents are probabilistic by nature, meaning consistency becomes just as important as functionality. Continuous testing, monitoring, and refinement therefore become integral to successful deployment.
Just as importantly, employees need to be part of the journey. Building trust isn't about unveiling an AI agent once it has been completed. It's about involving teams throughout development, helping them understand how decisions are made, where guardrails exist and how the technology is intended to augment and not replace their expertise.
Better agents will define the next phase of AI
It’s inevitable that the AI industry will continue producing faster, cheaper and more capable foundation models. But what isn't inevitable is whether organisations will be able to translate those capabilities into meaningful business value.
The next AI race won't be won by those with access to the biggest model. It will be won by those that build trusted, well-governed agents capable of solving real operational problems.
This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.
The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit
from Latest from TechRadar https://ift.tt/TRBev2C
Premier League 2026/27: Fri, Aug 21, 2026 – Sun, ...
Watch Premier League 2026/27 live streams as Arsenal begin the season as champions for the first time in 22 years, having ended their drought last term. The Gunners are aiming to become the first club not called Manchester City to retain the title since 2009, but several sides will believe they can knock them off their perch.
Three of the expected front-runners are under new management, with Enzo Maresca tasked with following Pep Guardiola at Manchester City, Andoni Iraola replacing Arne Slot at Liverpool and Xabi Alonso becoming the latest in a long line of head coaches at Chelsea. The two other clubs in the 'Big Six' are led by bosses who enjoyed strong finishes to last season, albeit at different ends of the table, with Michael Carrick getting the Manchester United job full-time and Roberto De Zerbi aiming to kick on from his successful survival mission at Tottenham Hotspur.
Aston Villa look strong again under Unai Emery after winning the Europa League last term, but Newcastle United have lost several key players and long-serving manager Eddie Howe, with Matthias Jaissle coming in. Bournemouth, Brighton and Brentford will aim to continue punching above their weight, as the Cherries embark on their first-ever European campaign under new boss Marco Rose, who replaced Iraola. Elsewhere, Crystal Palace hired former Lens manager Pierre Sage after Oliver Glasner left for Nottingham Forest, while Álvaro Arbeloa has swapped Real Madrid for Fulham.
Everton will hope to kick on from their first campaign at Hill Dickinson Stadium, while there is a buzz at Sunderland after they qualified for Europe in their first season back in the top flight. Leeds United's mission will be to stay well clear of the relegation zone, which could be a tall order for promoted trio Coventry City, Ipswich Town and Hull City.
It is set up to be a cracking season - here's where to watch Premier League 2026/27 live streams online from anywhere.
Premier League Fixtures & Broadcast Info: Matchday 1
All times BST
Friday 21 August
8pm — Arsenal vs Coventry: Sky Sports (UK) | USA Network (US)
Saturday 22 August
12:30pm — Hull vs Man Utd: TNT Sports (UK) | USA Network (US) 3pm — Everton vs Crystal Palace: N/A (UK) | USA Network (US) 3pm — Ipswich vs Sunderland: N/A (UK) | NBCSN/Peacock (US) 3pm — Nottm Forest vs Leeds: N/A (UK) | NBCSN/Peacock (US) 5:30pm — Brentford vs Tottenham: Sky Sports (UK) | NBC/Peacock (US)
Sunday 23 August
2pm — Brighton vs Aston Villa: Sky Sports (UK) | NBCSN/Peacock (US) 2pm — Man City vs Bournemouth: Sky Sports (UK) | USA Network (US) 4:30pm — Newcastle vs Liverpool: Sky Sports (UK) | USA Network (US)
Monday 24 August
8pm — Fulham vs Chelsea: Sky Sports (UK) | USA Network (US)
Watch the Premier League for free
Free Premier League 2026/27 streams are scarce but there are a couple of options.
Fans in Brazil can also watch select Premier League games completely free on CazéTV's YouTube channel.
Not in Brazil or the US? You need a VPN to unlock your FREE stream — find out more below.
Use a VPN to watch any Premier League 2026/27 stream
Chances are you'll find yourself overseas when some Premier League 2026/27 games are taking place, but does that mean you have to miss the action? No, it doesn't... a VPN will ensure you get your coverage from anywhere.
Premier League live streams are geo-restricted on all streaming services, but a VPN (Virtual Private Network) is a neat way around this, unpicking the geo-locks by altering your device's digital location. It's great for accessing your usual streaming services while on the move, and it does wonders for your internet security, too.
We rate NordVPN as the best VPN — more details below.
🥇 World's best VPN service 💰 75% off right now 🆓 3 months extra free
Get your VPN and stream the Premier League 2026/27 from anywhere in the world.View Deal
How to watch Premier League 2026/27 live streams in the US
NBC Universal has the rights to show the Premier League live in the US with all 380 matches across flagship channel NBC, Peacock and cable TV channel USA Network.
Peacock shows roughly half of the Premier League matches every week, with plans starting from $12.99 a month, or $129.99 a year.
There is no dedicated streaming platform for USA Network, but it is available on cord-cutters like YouTube TV, Hulu + Live TV, DirecTV Streamand Sling(select markets), many of which carry free trials. You can also get NBC and NBCSN on these cord-cutters.
Outside the US during the Premier League season? Use NordVPN to access your usual streams.
How to watch Premier League 2026/27 live streams in the UK
Sky Sports is the home of the Premier League in the UK, with at least 215 matches broadcast exclusively live across the season. Sky Sports packages cost £35 per month for new customers, or £22 per month if you already have a new 24-month Sky TV contract.
A further 52 games will be live on TNT Sports and its streaming partner HBO Max. A subscription costs £30.99 per month on a rolling monthly contract, or £25.99 per month for a minimum 12-month term.
And, don't forget that Match of the Day will continue for 2026/27 with extended highlight packages every Saturday and Sunday on BBC One.
If you're traveling outside the UK during the season, make sure you use NordVPN to tap into your home streams.
How to watch Premier League 2026/27 live streams in Australia
(Image credit: Other)
In Australia, Stan Sport has the rights to show every single Premier League game across the 2026/27 season.
Better still, it's now even cheaper to watch Down Under because Stan have introduced a new Basic tier with ads at AU$9.99. You'll also need the AU$20 Sport add-on, but you get every Premier League game, plus the Champions League, FA Cup, and more, all for AU$29.99 a month.
Abroad? You can use a NordVPN (try 100% risk-free) to watch all the action free of charge as if you were right at home.
Official Premier League 2026/27 broadcasters by region
Africa
Click to see more Premier League 2026/27 streams▼
The Premier League 2026/27 broadcast rights for Africa are largely split between BeIn SPORTS and SuperSport.
Residents in the Middle East and North Africa can watch Premier League 2026/27 live streams with a BeIn SPORTS subscription, while Satellite TV provider SuperSport has the Premier League TV rights across these regions in Africa:
Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, São Tomé and Príncipe, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, St Helena and Ascension, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe.
South Africa
SuperSport will host the Premier League 2026/27 on its satellite channels.
Americas
Click to see more Premier League 2026/27 streams▼
Canada
Fubo once again has the rights to broadcast the Premier League during the 2026/27 season.
Latin America
A combination of FOX and TNT Sports will show Premier League action in 2026/27 across the following regions in Latin America:
Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua and Panama.
Latin America
South American countries – including Brazil – will be able to watch live Premier League 2026/27 matches on ESPN, which also holds the rights in the Caribbean.
Remember, you can also watch one match per gameweek completely free on CazéTV's YouTube channel in Brazil.
Europe
Click to see more Premier League 2026/27 streams▼
The Premier League 2026/27 season will be shown by various broadcasters and streaming services throughout Europe. You can check out specific information about your country below.
Albania
Digitalb has the rights to show Premier League action this season.
Andorra
Soccer fans in Andorra can watch the action on a combination of CANAL+ and DAZN.
Armenia, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Romania
Premier League coverage comes from Saran Media channels in these countries.
Austria
Sky in Austria will show coverage of the Premier League in 2026/27.
Belgium
Telenet will broadcast the Premier League 2026/27 in Belgium.
Croatia, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia and Slovenia
You can watch the Premier League 2026/27 season on Arena Sport in these counties.
Cyprus
You can view the Premier League 2026/27 on Cytavision in Cyprus.
Czechia, Luxembourg, Poland and Slovakia
The Premier League 2026/27 season will be shown on CANAL+ in these territories.
Denmark, Finland, Netherlands, Norway and Sweden
Fans in these countries can watch the Premier League 2026/27 on Viaplay.
Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania
TV3 has the Premier League live stream rights in these countries this season.
France
There will be coverage of Premier League 2026/27 in France on CANAL+.
Germany
In Germany, the Premier League 2026/27 rights are owned by Sky.
Greece
Greeks should head to IMG and Nova for the Premier League 2026/27 season.
Hungary
Premier League 2026/27 live streams will go out on TV2 in Hungary.
Iceland
Syn is the place to watch Premier League football in Iceland.
Ireland
Premier Sports, TNT Sports and Sky Sports will broadcast coverage of the Premier League 2026/27 in Ireland.
Israel
Charlton has won the Premier League coverage rights in Israel.
Italy
Viewers in Italy can watch the Premier League 2026/27 on Sky Italia.
Malta
Maltese soccer fans will be able to watch Premier League action on TSN.
Portugal and Spain
DAZN has the rights to air the Premier League 2026/27 in Portugal and Spain.
Switzerland
Fans in Switzerland can watch the Premier League 2026/27 on CANAL+ for French language commentary, or Sky for German and Italian commentary.
Turkey
BeIn SPORTS in Turkey will host some coverage of the Premier League 2026/27.
Ukraine
Setanta Sports will show the Premier League 2026/27 in Ukraine.
Asia
Click to see more Premier League 2026/27 streams▼
Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan
The Premier League 2026/27 rights for these Central Asian countries are held by Saran Media.
Cambodia, Laos, and Thailand
Make your way to Jasmine if you want to watch the Premier League 2026/27 in these three countries.
China
In China, the Premier League 2026/27 will be shown by Migu.
Chinese Taipei
ELTA is the current Premier League rights holder here.
Hong Kong
PCCW is the place to go for the Premier League 2026/27 in Hong Kong.
India, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka
Star Sports (and the JioStar app) is the Premier League 2026/27 broadcaster for India plus Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.
Indonesia
Head to EMTEK channels in Indonesia for the rights to the Premier League 2026/27.
Japan
U-NEXT will show the Premier League 2026/27 in Japan.
Malaysia
Astro is the home of the Premier League 2026/27 in the Malaysia.
Mongolia
Unitel will show the coverage of the Premier League 2026/27 in Mongolia.
Singapore
StarHub provides coverage of the Premier League 2026/27 in Singapore.
South Korea
Coverage of the Premier League 2026/27 in South Korea can be found at Coupang.
Vietnam
Mono is the Premier League rights holder in Vietnam this season.
Oceania
Click to see more Premier League 2026/27 streams▼
Australia
As detailed above, Stan Sport has the rights to the Premier League 2026/27 in Australia.
New Zealand
Sky Sport is the Premier League 2026/27 TV rights holder in New Zealand.
Pacific Islands
Coverage in the Pacific Islands comes from Digicel. That covers:
BeIN Sports MENA is the Premier League 2026/27 broadcaster across the Middle East.
You can watch the Premier League 2026/27 live streams with a subscription to BeIN SPORTS in the following Middle East countries:
Bahrain, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, United Arab Emirates and Yemen.
When does the Premier League 2026/27 season start?
The Premier League 2026/27 season kicks off on Friday, August 21, with the final day of the campaign on Sunday, May 30.
Can I watch Premier League 2026/27 on my mobile?
Of course, most broadcasters have streaming services that you can access through mobile apps or via your phone's browser. For example, Sky Go in the UK.
We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example:1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service).2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad.We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.
from Latest from TechRadar https://ift.tt/Epy8JcO
Have you noticed that ChatGPT has suddenly start...
Have you noticed that ChatGPT has suddenly started dropping f-bombs? I have, and it seems that I’m not the only one.
It first happened in a casual chat, and it really caught me off guard. We were discussing Netflix’s Jujutsu Kaisen and before I had sworn in our chat, ChatGPT used the f-bomb to describe a character’s actions as “f**** awful”. Before that, I’d said things like “God damn,” in the conversation, but ChatGPT was the one to introduce the f-word. It did so completely unprompted, to add emphasis to how awful the person was, and that strikes me as a big change in its personality.
I wondered if it was doing that for other people, so I asked around on the team and they’d noticed it too. A quick online search turned up two Reddit threads almost immediately, from people who’d found the same thing.
It seems like in the last few days ChatGPT has developed a potty mouth. I actually like it — I’m not offended and for me, it makes the conversation better — but I don’t think everybody wants this. The question is, why has it started doing this now?
Here comes the science
The most interesting clue is that OpenAI's Model Spec, was updated this week. They made it public and it explicitly says the default is to avoid swearing — but crucially, that's only a guideline rather than a hard rule. And OpenAI says guidelines can be implicitly overridden by things such as “contextual cues, background knowledge, or user history.”
Its own example is that asking ChatGPT to speak like a realistic pirate implicitly overrides the no-swearing guideline. So, while I’d been having my informal conversation I’d passionately expressed the opinion that I didn’t care much for some of the characters in the show, and ChatGPT had matched the conversational tone, eventually leading it to start swearing.
That's consistent with a broader direction OpenAI has publicly acknowledged ChatGPT is moving in. Recent model updates have emphasized conversational quality, personalization and adapting tone contextually. OpenAI's model notes specifically describe personality updates designed to make ChatGPT “more conversational” and better at adapting its tone to context.
OpenAI has previously explained that ChatGPT’s personality isn't simply produced by one prompt somewhere. Model behavior is shaped through training, baseline instructions and user feedback, and seemingly small personality adjustments can have unintended effects. This was something it discussed very openly after the notorious GPT-4o sycophancy update.
It broke my mental model
Whether OpenAI deliberately made ChatGPT more willing to swear or it's simply an unintended consequence of making it more conversational, I don't know. But it’s a significant change in its behaviour either way.
Language matters, and when ChatGPT swore at me, I noticed immediately because it broke my mental model of how ChatGPT talks. It suddenly felt less like the carefully neutral AI assistant I'd been using for years and more like someone matching the tone of an informal conversation.
I happen to prefer this version of ChatGPT. Other people undoubtedly won't. And that's the strange thing about increasingly conversational AI: relatively small changes to the way it talks can make the thing on the other side of the screen feel surprisingly different.
For now, mine seems to have developed a potty mouth and I'm okay with that.
from Latest from TechRadar https://ift.tt/FZ8oEqR
UK Prime Minister was targeted by a scammer posin...
UK Prime Minister was targeted by a scammer posing as a top US aide
Personal devices bypass "national security perimeters," warns Surfshark
GenAI tools allow low-level criminals to clone high-profile identities
The recent revelation that UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham was targeted by an impersonator pretending to be top Donald Trump aide Susie Wiles has sent shockwaves through the cybersecurity community.
While the immediate political fallout dominates headlines, security experts are sounding the alarm over a far more terrifying technical reality — elite government defenses are essentially useless if the human holding the device can be tricked.
For everyday users, the incident serves as a stark reminder that even the most powerful figures are vulnerable to the same social engineering tactics deployed against the general public. Securing your digital life with the best VPN and robust security software is crucial, but as AI impersonation scams are skyrocketing, the ultimate vulnerability remains the personal smartphone itself.
Miguel Fornes, Information Security Manager at Surfshark, argues that personal devices have become a permanent, wide-open door into the world's most protected rooms. Speaking on why Burnham was such an easy target for this impersonation scam, Fornes painted a grim picture of modern cybersecurity perimeters.
“It proves that billion-dollar national security perimeters are completely useless when every high-value target carries an unmonitored attack vector in their pocket 24 hours a day,” Fornes told TechRadar.
Surfshark – the best cheap VPN Surfshark is a fast, easy-to-use VPN that seriously beats the competition when it comes to subscription pricing. Its two-year Starter plan works out at $2.49 a month(plus tax), but we think Surfshark One is the best value plan as it adds an antivirus, data breach monitor, alternative ID, and anti-scam tools. All of this starting from the equivalent of just $2.79 a month. View Deal
Hacking the human, not the firewall
The Burnham incident highlights a fundamental shift in how cybercriminals operate. Rather than attempting to break through the front door of government agencies, bad actors are simply slipping through the side window of personal communication apps.
"The attackers behind high-profile spoofing campaigns, like the recent impersonation of top Trump aide Susie Wiles to contact high-level officials like Andy Burnham, didn't waste time attempting to breach the world-class cryptographic shields of GCHQ or MI5," Fornes explained. "They simply exploited the chaotic, unmonitored environment of personal smartphones and private messaging apps."
The shift in threat models is precisely why cybersecurity providers are pivoting.
The message is clear. As Fornes said: "Cybercriminals aren't wasting time trying to break enterprise-grade encryption; they are simply hacking the human holding the screen."
(Image credit: Future)
NEW: Leave No Trace — A weekly newsletter on digital privacy and online surveillance.
Leave No Trace investigates the companies and governments putting our digital freedom at risk — and the people fighting back.
📩 Subscribe now to get every edition delivered to your inbox every Friday, launching this September.
The terrifying asymmetry of GenAI
The barrier to entry for executing intelligence-agency-level operations has collapsed, largely thanks to advancements in generative AI. With a reported $3.7B lost to deepfakes and social engineering, the landscape has fundamentally changed.
As Fornes explained, readily available GenAI has democratized state-level cyber warfare. "A random individual with a poor internet connection and a mediocre computer can now perfectly clone the voice, cadence, and mind of the world's most powerful political operatives," he told TechRadar.
This technological democratization creates a terrifying asymmetry where the barrier to entry for globally destabilizing social engineering is essentially gone, allowing low-level criminals to execute intelligence-agency-level operations.
"We should consider ourselves lucky that this time they were, again, common cyberscammers asking for money," Fornes concluded.
Across the UK, "will AI take my job?" has become one of the nation's most searched fears, a concern echoed in a recent open letter signed by more than 200 economists and technology leaders, including former Google CEO Eric Schmidt.
The letter warned that without the right guardrails, increasingly powerful AI could drive large-scale job displacement.
This anxiety around job stability has, unsurprisingly, increased in line with some of the world's largest employers - including Microsoft and Meta - announcing cuts to thousands of roles over the last year.
Left to interpret what that means for their own futures, employees globally have become accustomed to fear and uncertainty.
The impact is far-reaching, with recent research indicating that widespread anxiety is now impacting career decisions. In fact, as many as one in three workers say they are planning to retire earlier than planned, while 25% of workers are considering moving into industries less exposed to AI.
Although concerning, this potential “white-collar exodus” isn't a rejection of AI itself; most workers say the technology makes them productive when introduced with proper training and clear goals. However, it’s a response to how AI is being rolled out: often with little clarity, minimal support and not enough acknowledgement of the potential impact on employees’ confidence in their own expertise.
Left unaddressed, the impact will be felt in retention, engagement and institutional knowledge. Designing and prioritizing ways of working that incorporate transparency and training, while prioritizing job satisfaction and performance, has become a board-level priority.
The cost of the exodus
Many workers feel that AI could reduce the need for their role within a few years, and that fear is not misplaced. Finance, professional services, and IT jobs have already felt this pressure, with PwC cutting 200 entry-level roles this year.
But we must not fall into the trap of reading this as solely a graduate or entry-level problem. In reality, according to a Gartner survey of C-level executives, 56% are extremely likely to quit due to the impact of AI and burnout. This is in some ways more harmful, presenting a clear risk of knowledge attrition across organizations as expertise born of human experience is lost.
Job security writes only the first chapter. Knowledge workers are increasingly frustrated that AI allows tasks once requiring years of expertise to be completed by almost anyone. The concern is about whether experience, judgement and specialist knowledge still carry value. And when organizations fail to redefine what human expertise contributes, disengagement festers.
Compounding this is the growing issue of AI fatigue. More than half of all content online is now AI-generated. So workers clocking off from AI at work are simply wading into more of the same at home, extending far beyond the 9-5 that businesses can measure or manage. Harvard Business Review has linked AI fatigue to decision fatigue, errors, and higher intent to quit.
In response, employees are actively cutting back their use of AI tools. However, investment shows little sign of slowing. Enterprise AI spending reached £1.2 million last year, up 108% on the year before, highlighting the growing gap between organizational investment and employee adoption and engagement.
This combined effect results in a workforce that's disengaging, under-using costly tools and potentially planning their exit. This demands urgent action from businesses, who need to address how AI is implemented and communicated, and act before disengagement turns into departure.
The path forward: Building trust through transparency
Positively, some organizations are already demonstrating what successful AI adoption looks like, grounded in an understanding that communication and culture should be taken as seriously as the technology itself.
IBM, for example, is both expanding and redefining entry-level hiring for an AI-first workplace, detailing where the organization is headed. Since workers often don't understand why they're expected to use AI in their role, moves like IBM’s can help to close a critical communication gap.
Transparency, clear guardrails and genuine dialogue are what turn AI spend into engagement. When people understand where they fit into the future of work, they're far more likely to embrace the technology shaping it.
Reducing digital noise
The instinct in most organizations is to let AI creep into everything at once. In practice, AI delivers the most value - and does the least damage to worker purpose and confidence - when it targets administrative burden and repetitive tasks.
AI tools shouldn’t undermine the judgement, experience and specialist knowledge that people bring to their roles. Careless implementation of AI is the fastest route to the fear of expertise erosion that drives people toward the exit.
Investing in reskilling and upskilling
Adaptavist’s recent research into the human cost of AI reveals that 74% of workers are already taking the initiative to build AI skills, showing that willingness to adapt isn't the problem. But organizations must match that commitment. Rather than treating AI training as a one-off exercise during rollout, businesses should implement continuous learning and support that evolves alongside the technology.
The value of this approach is already being recognized widely. The UK Government has introduced its AI skills program with the ambition of training 10 million workers, backed by partners including the NHS. The recent “skills compact” plan also puts the onus on employers to address skills gaps in AI across financial services.
Both initiatives reflect a growing understanding that successful AI adoption depends as much on investing in people as it does on technology and tools. Effective training should help employees understand how their expertise continues to add value, giving them confidence that AI is there to enhance their role, not to replace it.
Building psychological safety around experimentation
An important reality is that none of the above works if people are afraid to use the tools they're being trained on. Infosys has acknowledged the importance of psychological safety by framing AI adoption as an opportunity to experiment and improve without fear that mistakes will damage confidence or career prospects.
A study published in Occupational Medicine found employees who had 1:1s five times or more within two months reported significantly higher psychological safety than those with fewer meetings. Direct conversations to understand concerns, discuss how AI fits into their career development, and address uncertainty also show a marked improvement.
None of these approaches requires organizations to pare back their AI ambitions. Ultimately, the businesses that retain their best employees will be those that treat AI anxiety as a change management problem, measured by whether their most experienced people still feel essential to the work.
This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.
The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit
The prospect of bringing more of Britain's critical national infrastructure into public ownership has prompted plenty of debate about investment, governance and accountability.
Far less attention has been paid to what it could mean for cybersecurity.
Regardless of where you stand politically, one thing is clear. Public ownership does not make cyber risk disappear.
If anything, it raises expectations that essential services will be more resilient, more coordinated and better prepared to withstand disruption.
That expectation reflects the reality of the threat landscape. Energy providers, water companies, transport operators and healthcare organizations all sit at the center of complex digital ecosystems. Their ability to deliver essential services depends on thousands of suppliers, technology vendors and third parties.
When one organization is compromised, the effects can spread well beyond its own network. Resilience therefore depends on far more than protecting individual organizations. It depends on understanding and managing the relationships between them.
If the government is serious about strengthening national infrastructure, cybersecurity must become part of that conversation from day one. That means moving beyond isolated security programs and towards a model where organizations share intelligence, understand common risks and coordinate their response before disruption spreads.
Some of the defining cyber attacks of recent years have demonstrated that attackers are rarely interested in a single target. They look for opportunities to compromise one organization in order to reach many others.
The SolarWinds attack remains one of the clearest examples. By compromising trusted software updates, attackers gained access to thousands of organizations around the world. More recently, the ransomware attack on Synnovis disrupted pathology services across several NHS trusts, leading to cancelled operations, delayed appointments and widespread disruption to patient care.
Neither incident remained confined to the organization that was initially compromised. Both exposed the reality that critical infrastructure now depends on interconnected supply chains as much as physical assets.
That presents a challenge for every operator of critical national infrastructure. Security can no longer be viewed solely through the lens of protecting your own estate. Organizations also need visibility into the threats affecting suppliers, partners and the wider ecosystem. A vulnerability within a software provider or outsourced service can quickly become a problem for every organization that depends on it.
This is where many existing security programs begin to show their limitations. Organizations have invested heavily in detection technologies, vulnerability management platforms and threat intelligence feeds. They are collecting more information than ever before. Yet many still struggle to translate that information into confident operational decisions.
Better decisions start with better intelligence
The cybersecurity industry has spent years focusing on visibility. The assumption has been that if organizations can discover every vulnerability, identify every asset and collect every threat feed, they will naturally become more secure.
The evidence suggests otherwise.
Filigran's recent State of Threat Management report found that organizations consume an average of fourteen different threat intelligence feeds, yet fewer than half have fully operationalized that intelligence across their security programs.
At the same time, 84% of respondents said the attacks they experience exploit risks that were already known but had not been prioritized. Almost every organization surveyed also reported difficulty determining whether identified exposures were genuinely exploitable.
Those findings illustrate a wider industry problem. The challenge is no longer discovering risk. It is deciding which risks deserve immediate attention.
Security teams are surrounded by alerts, vulnerability reports and intelligence updates. Every tool claims to identify another critical issue demanding urgent action. Without context, everything starts to look important. Analysts spend valuable time investigating vulnerabilities that may never be exploited while genuinely dangerous attack paths remain hidden among the noise.
That has consequences beyond operational efficiency. Every hour spent investigating a low priority issue is an hour that cannot be spent reducing real business risk. Organizations are not simply overwhelmed by the volume of information. They are overwhelmed by the number of decisions they are expected to make every day.
Threat intelligence should shape decisions long before an incident
One reason this happens is that threat intelligence is still too often treated as a function of the Security Operations Centre. Intelligence is gathered, analyzed and used to help detect or investigate malicious activity once attackers have already reached the network.
Yet, threat intelligence has far greater value when it informs decisions much earlier in the security lifecycle.
Used effectively, it should help organizations understand which vulnerabilities are actively being targeted, which attack paths present the greatest business risk and which remediation activities will deliver the greatest reduction in exposure. Rather than treating every vulnerability as equally urgent, security teams can focus on the threats that genuinely matter to their environment.
This is also where Continuous Threat Exposure Management, or CTEM, has an important role to play. CTEM should not be viewed as another technology category or another security acronym. It provides a structured framework for connecting threat intelligence, exposure management, validation and remediation into a continuous process. Instead of relying on assumptions or theoretical risk scores, organizations can validate whether a vulnerability is genuinely exploitable before committing time and resources to fixing it.
Perhaps the biggest obstacle is not technical at all. Many organizations still operate with threat intelligence, vulnerability management, penetration testing and governance teams working independently, each with different priorities, processes and tooling. Breaking down those silos often delivers greater improvements than introducing another security platform.
Building a national capability
If critical infrastructure is expected to become more resilient, collaboration has to become part of everyday operations rather than something that only happens during a major incident. That thinking is already beginning to take shape.
Earlier this month, the National Cyber Security Centre and GCHQ issued a call for industry, academia and critical infrastructure operators to help define Cyber Shield, a proposed national cyber defense capability designed to combine AI, shared intelligence and coordinated defense at national scale.
Significantly, the initiative recognizes that the government cannot build this capability alone. It will depend on close collaboration with the organizations responsible for protecting the UK's essential services.
Additionally, the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill provides an opportunity to strengthen that approach by encouraging greater consistency across essential sectors. Frameworks such as the National Cyber Security Centre's Cyber Assessment Framework already give organizations a common language for measuring resilience.
They become even more valuable when they encourage organizations to learn from one another instead of tackling similar challenges in isolation.
Open standards have an important role to play as well. The Dutch National Cyber Security Centre recently made STIX and TAXII 2.1 the mandatory standard for sharing cyber threat intelligence across government.
While technical on the surface, the decision reflects a broader principle. When organizations exchange intelligence using common standards, they remove friction from collaboration and can respond to threats more quickly.
Technology alone will not deliver that outcome. Artificial intelligence, automation and modern security platforms can help organizations process more information and reduce manual effort, but they still depend on good intelligence, sound governance and trusted relationships.
For the simple reason that fast decisions only become good decisions when they are supported by the right context.
Resilience is a shared responsibility
Whether more of Britain's critical national infrastructure ultimately moves into public ownership is only part of the story. Cyber attackers do not distinguish between public and private organizations. They target weak links, trusted suppliers and interconnected systems wherever they find them.
The organizations that will be best prepared for the years ahead will be those that treat resilience as a collective responsibility. They will operationalize threat intelligence before incidents occur, validate real-world risk rather than relying on assumptions, and collaborate across organizational boundaries as readily as attackers do.
Protecting critical infrastructure has never been solely about defending individual organizations. It is about strengthening the entire ecosystem that keeps essential services running. If the UK wants to build genuinely resilient national infrastructure, that is where the conversation needs to begin.
This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.
The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit
Follow Us
Were this world an endless plain, and by sailing eastward we could for ever reach new distances