Latest Technology News

Home Top Ad

Responsive Ads Here

Dyson CameraJet: One minute review As the only to...

Dyson CameraJet: One minute review

As the only toothbrush and water flosser with a built-in 100k pixel macro lens camera, the CameraJet offers something unique. It’s designed to identify gaps in the teeth and precision floss as you brush and gently blast away at plaque for a thorough clean. The Dyson CameraJet was unveiled by its founder and chief engineer James Dyson in Paris on Tuesday 1 September, and I’ve been using it for a week prior to launch. I was keen to see if its impressive spec could change the way I brush, and see, my teeth. While I’m still getting to grips with how to get the best from its settings and perfect my brushing technique, so far I’ve been enjoying the results and it may well make it onto our best electric toothbrush list.

At £419.99 (US $568 / AUS $794) for the set including a charging dock, travel case, Dyson Toothpaste and Dyson Mouthrinse, there’s no denying that this mouth-watering set comes at an eye-watering price.

You can already find AI/smart toothbrushes with sensors, smart apps and voice guidance available online from the likes of Oclean, Philips, Oral-B or Feno, of course, but none of these have a built-in endoscopic camera like the Dyson CameraJet, or include such an array of promising tech. I’ve tried water flossers in the past, but none that seem so mindfully designed.

The CameraJet provides a live-view the inside of your mouth, which you can view on the accompanying MyDyson app on your smartphone. This allows you to see where you’re cleaning, where you need to brush and how you can improve brushing and flossing. Having a toothbrush with built-in Wi-Fi camera in the bathroom does make me feel a little uneasy, but Dyson assures me that no images are recorded or stored on the product or in the cloud, and images remain private to the user.

At the time of writing, the companion MyDyson CameraJet app has only just gone live, so i’ve only used the live-view feature for a few guided brushing sessions. But the picture quality is clear, even if all I can see is a sea of gum, teeth and bubbles, and it streams with no lag, which is very impressive. I’ll be interested to see what personalised oral care insights it gathers in the coming days.

The CameraJet’s built-in anti-gravity mouthrinse tank makes its cordless design bulkier than your standard electric toothbrush, but I’ve found it comfortable to handle and control. I also like that it’s cordless unlike some water flossers, and you can use it in multiple directions in your mouth. However, if I don’t close my mouth properly, it splashes my mirror unapologetically while in auto-jet flossing mode.

The dual-bristle brush feels a nice size against my teeth and it glides along the contours with a satisfying pressure and firmness. Its variable sonic oscillation technology keeps the brush in constant motion to make it easier to get hard to reach areas without the brush stalling. It’s easy to refill and charge on its dedicated stand too.

What makes the Dyson CameraJet seemingly effective when blasting mouthrinse at plaque is its broad conical shaped spray that provides wide coverage. It took me a while to get used to the feel of the jet spray as it tickled every tooth. But with a slow and steady pace I was able to improve my brushing and flossing technique every time to get the best from the CameraJet, even if I couldn’t see myself in the bathroom mirror afterwards.

Dyson CameraJet: Specifications

Price

£419.99 / around $568 and $792 AUD)

Camera

100k pixel macro lens camera

Smart connectivity

Wi-Fi at 2.4GHz and Bluetooth connected

Colorways

Ceramic Ultra Blue and Ceramic Pink

Dimensions

L 273mm x W 44mm x D 44mm

Dyson CameraJet: Price and availability

Dyson CameraJet electric toothbrush

(Image credit: Future / Emily Peck)
  • £419.99 (around $568 and $792 AUD)
  • Available in Ceramic Ultra Blue or Ceramic Pink colorways
  • For use with 75ml tube of Dyson Toothpaste and 400ml bottle of Dyson Mouthrinse

At the time of writing, the mouth-watering Dyson CameraJet costs £419.99 (around $568 and $792 AUD). This includes the colour choice of either Ceramic Ultra Blue or Ceramic Pink, and comes in a set including a charging dock, travel case, 75ml tube of Dyson Toothpaste and 400ml bottle of Dyson Mouthrinse.

While oral care may be a far cry from Dyson’s floorcare and air purifying categories, I think the CameraJet aligns mindfully with Dyson’s growing portfolio of tech beauty products. If you already own the game-changing Dyson Supersonic hair dryer and new Dyson Co-anda2x complete with new attachments, buying the CameraJet may just feel like a natural next step, but you will need to take the hit of its high-end price.

Just as Dyson has complemented its beauty tools with hair products such as its Chitosan styling range, Dyson has also formulated its special Dyson toothpaste and mouthwash formula. These are optimised to be non-foaming so the camera can see clearly while you brush. A 400ml bottle of mouthrinse that dispenses the precise 12.5ml should last around 32 brushes – if you’re using the mouthrinse twice daily that gives you around 16 days before having to refill. A set of two brush heads costs £25, while the Dyson toothpaste and mouthrinse are £8.49 ($11.50 / AUS $16 each.

The toothbrush heads will need to be replaced every three months. The brushes are RFID enabled, so you’ll get an alert on the app when it’s time to change them.

  • Value score: 3.5/5

Dyson CameraJet: Design

Dyson CameraJet electric toothbrush

(Image credit: Future / Emily Peck)
  • Dual-bristle brush head to contour teeth
  • Powerful sonic motor oscillates 245 times a second to help remove plaque
  • WiFi enabled at 2.4 GHz with Bluetooth connectivity, designed to work with companion smart app

With its built-in camera, conical jet, flexible control pad, feature-packed app and luxurious pink or blue styling, the Dyson CameraJet design looks and feels premium.

It comes presented in a Dyson-branded cardboard box with a refill dock, USB-C charger and two dual-bristle brush heads with plastic case. There’s no carry bag in the box, but I think this would make a nice addition if you’re travelling with it.

You also get a Dyson mouthrinse and non-foaming toothpaste, which contains sodium fluoride to help fortify enamel and strengthen teeth.Both the toothpaste and mouthrinse taste agreeable, and are quite subtle in minty-ness.

It takes eight hours to recharge the brush fully on the refill dock that takes a USB-C. Battery should last for eight hours, but this all depends on how long you use it for, and which settings you choose.

To set up you can either pour the mouthrinse into the refill dock or straight into the CameraJet tank. I poured three quarters of my 400ml mouthrinse bottle into the refill doc, so that I could fill up the mouthrinse tank on the CameraJet after each use simply by pressing a button on the dock. To clean the brush after use, I simply rinsed its brush head, ran the tank under water and allowed the brush to dry while on the dock.

The 100k pixel macro lens camera is built into the design just below the brush head. What makes the camera accurate in its jet sprays while flossing – so you’re not just blinding firing mouthrinse into your mouth – is its Gap Optical Targeting, which is Dyson’s AI learning machine algorithm. This scans 28 live images per second to identify, track and predict gaps between the teeth.

With variable sonic oscillation that varies the angle of the brush to improve plaque removal and prevent it from stalling, the brush head feels comfortable to use. While the body of the CameraJet is quite large for a toothbrush, the brush head is a comfortable size, and it contours my mouth smoothly.

The brush comes with a control panel on the front with three intensity settings, and modes for brushing, flossing or brushing and floss at the same time. The anti-gravity mouthrinse tank also delivers the recommended 25ml amount of mouthrinse each time you use it. This has a diaphragm pump and pressure chamber that adapts during use to eliminate air pockets and prevent the device from firing blanks. This means it should provide uninterrupted jets of mouthwash, whichever way you hold its cordless design. I found it a little hit and miss at times, particularly in the front teeth, but there’s a knack to brushing correctly that I haven’t quite mastered yet.

With the WiF-connected camera acting like a dental endoscope, the brushes smart app can show you a live-view of the inside of your mouth. I found it easy to connect to the app over WiFi, and while I’ve only tried it a few times, i’m really impressed with how clear a picture quality it displays and how quickly the picture streams.

As I use the brush more, and follow the guided cleaning sessions in the app, my technique will no doubt improve, resulting in a much more thorough clean. Here you can see which bits you’re missing and get advice on how to improve your clean.

  • Design score: 4/5

Dyson CameraJet: Performance

Dyson CameraJet electric toothbrush

(Image credit: Future / Emily Peck)
  • Variable sonic oscillation to prevent stalling and keep bristles moving
  • With 100k pixel macro lens camera and conical jet to target gaps between teeth
  • Flexible jet-flossing controls and three brushing intensity modes

The first time I tried to use the CameraJet I got a spray of mouthwash on my forehead when I turned it on. It’s then that I discovered my rule number one – make sure to direct it away from the face when turning it on.

Once inside my mouth, I found it comfortable to use, even if its tooth-tickling spray did take a few attempts to get used to. At 61.3 dBa – measured at home on my decibel meter app on its highest setting – it’s not too noisy either but gently hums away. Its medium-firm, dual-bristle brush head is a nice shape and glided along my gums comfortably.

On board its powerful sonic motor and diaphragm pump is designed to deliver a targeted, pressurized conical jet spray in as fast as one-tenth of a second to target plaque effectively.

Dyson suggests applying light pressure and allowing the toothbrush to do the work. You also need to keep moving the brush as you use it to ensure the camera can find the gaps dispense the jet sprays, and this can be a little tricky to start off with. It doesn’t always fire a jet spray when I think it should, but I’m getting better at handling it. This is where the app is also helping, as I can see exactly which teeth are being cleaned and getting prompts to ‘part my lips wide’ and move sections. I can also follow the guided cleaning sessions, while the camera tracks which teeth i’m cleaning in real time.

The app only went live a day prior to launch, so I haven’t really had a proper chance to use it, but I do find it strangely exciting to see the inside of my mouth in real time while I brush. It’s a sight I only thought I’d see when visiting the dentist, and while it offers a little more insight than I’d like, I can see that it has the potential to be very helpful when cleaning - and when you’ve got toothache or something stuck in between your teeth.

From the three brush intensity settings, I’ve been finding the deepest clean the most effective. As well as the option to either brush or floss for two minutes, you can also brush and floss for three minutes at the same time. The toothpaste is non-foaming, which helps to reduce any slurry in my mouth, but when I’m flossing and trying to look at which teeth I’m brushing, my bathroom mirror is getting a lot of spray. I think when the app goes live and Ii’m able to view a live-stream of the inside of my mouth while flossing, this might make things a little less messy. It will also be able to tell me which teeth I’m missing.

After a week, this more disciplined approach has left my mouth feeling fresher and cleaner. But while I trust the jets are working, I don’t think I’m quite ready to give up my dental tape completely just yet.

When I first set eyes on the Dyson CameraJet, I couldn’t help but wonder if its built-in camera was just a superfluous gimmick or a useful oral health tool. But having trialled it for a week, I’m impressed by its premium feel and just how deeply it seems to be cleaning my teeth. On first look I think the app is rather special too, and has the potential to be really quite useful.

Overall, I think if you’re willing to make the spend, the Camerajet can be a smart and informative oral health tool. And as regularly as I’m currently using it, I know I’ll feel much more confident next time I visit my hygienist.

  • Performance score: 4/5

Dyson CameraJet: Scorecard

Dyson CameraJet electric toothbrush

(Image credit: Future / Emily Peck)

Category

Comment

Score

Value

Premium price and you need to factor in the cost of refills, mouthrinse and toothpaste

3.5/5

Design

Easy to hold and comfortable in hand. Built in mouthrinse tank makes it a little bulky.

4/5

Features

Impressive 100k pixel macro lens camera and variable sonic brushing. Useful guided cleaning sessions and live-stream insight on the app.

5/5

Performance

Feels like a thorough clean, even if the splashes make it messy to use in jet flossing mode

4/5

Total

4/5

Dyson Camerajet: Should I buy?

Buy it if…

You want to improve your cleaning coverage

The conical jet on this device is optimized to precision floss while you brush. By simply using it twice a day for three minutes at a time, you’re taking positive steps to try and improve your oral hygiene. There’s also an accompanying app to help guide you.

You love a smart app with health data

This smart toothbrush pairs with the MyDyson app on your smartphone to give you access to even more health data.

You want to try jet flossing

The convenient thing about the Dyson CameraJet is that its conical jet spray delivers the recommended amount of mouthrinse from its built-in anti-gravity tank. It can help keep plaque at bay and leave your mouth feeling fresh.

Don’t buy it if…

The idea of a camera-based product makes you uneasy

Smart devices aren’t for everyone, although Dyson does take privacy seriously. The camera is only active during live viewing or auto-jetting settings and Dyson states that no images are recorded or stored on the product or in the cloud, and images remain private to the user.

You’re squeamish

The built-in camera on the CameraJet doubles as an oral endoscope and is designed to work alongside the MyDyson smart app to provide a live feed of the inside of your mouth while you brush. Of course you don’t have to use this feature, but it’s a key part of the offering and may just help with brushing.

Your budget is tight

You could argue that with this toothbrush you’ll be potentially saving money on dental bills, but you’ll also need to factor in the cost of replacement brushes every three months, Dyson toothpaste and mouthrinse.

Also consider

Suri Core 1.0 electric toothbrush

It may not have a built-in water flosser, but the latest Suri Core 1.0 electric toothbrush is very effective. It comes with gentle haptic pressure sensor to let you know when you’re brushing too hard, recyclable heads and gives you an impressive four-weeks battery life on a full charge.

Read our full Suri Core 1.0 review

Oral-B iO Series 10

Our best premium AI powered electric toothbrush.

Read our full Oral-B iO Series review

How I tested

Back in May 2026, I visited Dyson’s global headquarters to see how the CameraJet was engineered, constructed and tested. Prior to its launch on September 1st, I tested CameraJet myself at home over the course of a week. I assessed its design, performance, battery life, brush modes and noise levels using a decibel meter reading on my smartphone. At the time of reviewing, the app has only just gone live.



from Latest from TechRadar https://ift.tt/dj9vqHo

Dali launches budget-friendly subwoofer in colorf...

  • Dali launches budget-friendly subwoofer in colorful colors, to match its Rubik and Sonik 1 speakers
  • 8-inch downwards firing subwoofer with adjustable gain and phase, 170W RMS / 220W peak Class D amplification
  • Launching in October 2026 for $800 / £429 (about AU$815)

Dali has a habit of making five-star speakers, including the Dali Kupid and Dali Sonik 1, both of which got full marks from us. And now there's a colorful compact subwoofer to give these two speakers even more oomph, if you find bookshelves to be light on low-end.

The new Basik Sub turns your stereo setup into a 2.1 system and solves a problem that applies to any compact bookshelf speakers: there's a limit to how low you can go without putting in bigger drivers. By adding an eight-inch downfiring subwoofer to your setup, the Basik Sub is designed to add the low-end punch that makes music and movies even more entertaining.

Dali Kupid speakers in all five colors

The Basik Sub comes in five colors to match the range of Kupid bookshelf speakers pictured here, or to blend in with your decor (Image credit: Dali)

Dali Basik Sub: key features and pricing

The Basik Sub features Dali's own 8-inch long throw woofer, which is teamed with an oversized ferrite magnet and a high-flux motor system that Dali says delivers precise control. It also features a long, vented voice coil designed to maintain cooling and minimize compression as you turn the levels up.

Dali went with a down-firing rather than front-firing subwoofer for two key reasons: to deliver more even bass distribution, and to give you more options when it comes to positioning your subwoofer in your room.

Power comes from a 170W RMS / 220W peak Class D amplifier, and there's a built-in dual-stage limiter. Gain, crossover and phase controls are adjustable to make the Basik compatible with a wide range of speaker setups.

Of course, it's not just limited to being used in a 2.1 system — the Dali Sonik range is also designed to be used as surround sounds as well as for stereo setups, so the Basik is a good fit for a budget home theater system too.

The enclosure is made of MDF, features four decoupled feet to reduce vibration and comes in a choice of Solid Black, Solid White, Caramel White, Golden Yellow and Chilly Blue.

The Dali Basik Sub will go on sale in October 2026 with a recommended price of $800 / £429 / €500 (about AU$815).



from Latest from TechRadar https://ift.tt/CLcB5ld

Suri Core 1.0: One minute review I’ve tested nume...

Suri Core 1.0: One minute review

I’ve tested numerous electric brushes with far too many settings and features, from 12+ brushing modes to apps that provide real-time guidance. Yet I inevitably end up using them in the same way: pick up the brush, press the button once, brush my teeth, then put it back in the cupboard until the next time. I’ve never used an app outside of a review period, and I rarely bother with any extra settings either. Battery life is also important to me, as I don’t have a compatible plug socket in my bathroom. And I’d also rather not throw out too many plastic brush-heads that will ultimately end up in landfill.

Suri brushes are designed to be no-fuss, no-frills sonic toothbrushes with minimal settings to avoid a simple tool from becoming unnecessarily complicated, alongside recyclable elements. The Suri Core 1.0 sticks closely to this brief, offering a more affordable alternative to its successful, pricier Pro range.

Naturally, Suri has cut some corners with the Core 1.0 to keep the price down, notably replacing the metal body with a "bio-plastic" one made from renewable sources and recycled material, while the motor is slightly weaker, offering 28,000 movements a minute instead of the Pro 2.0’s 30,000. It doesn’t come with a clean-and-charge case as the Pro does, either. Instead, you simply get a brush cap for travel. It lasts six days fewer than the Pro on a full charge, with a battery that lasts 28 days compared to the Pro's 34 days.

These efficiency savings are minor, and do nothing to impact the toothbrush’s overall quality. The simple design makes it eminently easy to use, while the built-in timer uses haptic feedback every 30 seconds to help you keep track of brushing time. It looks great, too, especially when stuck to the wall using the provided magnetic mirror-mount attachment. It doesn't feel quite as pleasing in the hand as the metal model, but the pastel-coloured body has a stylish look that will happily fit the aesthetics of a variety of bathrooms. Whichever colour you choose, the brush head is white.

Speaking of brush heads, in the US and UK, Suri operates prepaid mailing programs that enable you to send used heads back to the company, which it then recycles and makes into new products such as soap dishes. The toothbrush is also covered by a warranty, during which Suri will repair and return it at no cost. In addition, across the brush's construction, Suri has introduced measures to reduce the environmental impact of the plastics it uses, from recycled to recyclable materials to more responsible production and disposal .

Suri Core 1.0

(Image credit: Future)

I tested this toothbrush for 21 days straight, and in that time didn't have to charge it. The two-minute timer is automatic, with no option to adjust it manually: the brush pulses every 30 seconds to signal that you move to the next quadrant of your mouth then shuts off automatically when the two minutes are up.

There are a couple of niggles. The first is that the brush is almost too simple: alongside its Clean and Polish settings, I’d like to see a gentler mode "sensitive" setting for more delicate teeth and gums. The pressure sensor requires some force to activate it, which could result in over-brushing, and it’s quite loud in operation, registering 69db in my noise measuring app.

But I’m nitpicking. Overall, the Suri Core 1.0 is a simple, high-quality sonic toothbrush for a reasonable price, with some sustainability credentials to boot. It would certainly be my pick over some of the more expensive, feature-stuffed brushes that spring to mind.

Suri Core 1.0: Specifications

Suri Core 1.0

(Image credit: Future)

Component

Suri Core 1.0

Battery life

28 days

Sonic vibrations

28,000/m

Charging stand

USB-C

Timer

30 seconds, haptic

Noise

69db

Settings

Two

Suri Core 1.0: Price and availability

  • $75 in the US
  • £65 in the UK
  • Not yet in the AU

The Suri Core 1.0 is priced at $75 / £65, cheaper than other brushes in the Suri range, which come in at $99 / £85, and offers good value. It’s more expensive than budget electric toothbrushes such as the Ordo Sonic Lite, which is similarly basic in terms of features, but the Core 1.0 feels like a worthwhile step up.

It’s reliable, looks great on your bathroom counter-top, and with Suri's free brush-head recycling scheme, you can feel good about doing your bit for the environment, too.

Suri Core 1.0: Scorecard

Suri Core 1.0

(Image credit: Future)

Category

Comment

Score

Value

Pricier than some budget toothbrushes, but good value overall.

4/5

Design

Great look, simple to use, recyclable and sustainable design elements.

5/5

Performance

Strong motor, great battery, simple to use.

4.5/5

Suri Core 1.0: Should I buy?

Buy it if…

You’re after something simple

The Suri Core 1.0 does one job, at two intensities, and does it well.

You want a toothbrush that looks good

The Suri Core 1.0's pleasant design will look great on a bathroom shelf.

You want value

Suri made this toothbrush specifically to appeal to budget buyers.

Don’t buy it if…

You want an oscillating toothbrush

The sonic toothbrush is just a simple vibration model, whereas Oral-B models come with rotating heads.

You’ve got very sensitive teeth

You may prefer a brush with more settings and a lighter pressure sensor.

Also consider

Ordo Sonic Lite

One of the best budget toothbrushes on the market.

Read our full Ordo Sonic Lite review

Suri 2.0 electric toothbrush

Suri's excellent full-price electric toothbrush model.

Read our full Suri 2.0 review

How I tested

I used the Suri Core 1.0 sonic toothbrush for three weeks, brushing morning and night. I measured the decibel levels of the toothbrush using an app, and compared the specs to its contemporaries in the space.

First reviewed: August 2026



from Latest from TechRadar https://ift.tt/sjTcJvb

Lanterns episode 3 has been released on HBO Max ...

Lanterns episode 3 has been released on HBO Max — and, after two weeks of teasing, it finally pulls back the veil on the mysterious extraterrestrials known as the Guardians of the Universe.

Until now, the Guardians have been something of an enigma in the HBO TV Original. However, its latest chapter, titled 'OutKast', gives us a much clearer picture of these beings and why they want John Stewart to succeed Hal Jordan as Earth's Green Lantern.

So, who are they? Where did they come from? Do they have powers? What's their connection to the Green Lantern Corps? And why are they obsessed with Stewart replacing Jordan? Let's take a closer look at the Guardians' comic book history and role in this HBO Max sci-fi crime drama.

Who are the Guardians of the Universe in DC Comics?

A screenshot of a DC comic book showing five Guardians of the Universe

The Guardians of the Universe first appeared in July 1960 via Green Lantern Vol. 2 #1 (Image credit: DC Comics)

Created by DC icons Gil Kane and Jeff Broome during the Silver Age of Comic Books, the Guardians of the Universe are an immortal alien race depicted as blue-skinned humanoids originally from the planet Maltus. However, after a time-bending experiment — one that leads to the birth of the DC Multiverse and the anti-matter universe — goes awry, the Maltusians relocated to a new world named Oa and rebranded themselves as the Guardians of the Universe.

The Guardians gave themselves a new objective following the aforementioned and ill-fated time-based test: combat evil and create an orderly universe.

With this goal in mind, they created sentient androids known as the Manhunters to patrol the universe and combat any threats they encounter. However, the Manhunters soon came to resent their creators, committed mass genocide in a harrowing event known as the Massacre of Sector-666, and later attempted a coup, which the Guardians quelled. For more on the Manhunters and their role in this show, read my Manhunters in Lanterns explained piece.

Laura Linney's Lianna sitting opposite an off-camera John Stewart in Lanterns episode 1

Laura Linney's Lianna is the only Guardian we've met so far (Image credit: DC Studios/HBO)

In the wake of the Manhunters' uprising, the Guardians started afresh and created the Green Lantern Corps. A new interstellar police agency, its members carry out the Manhunters' former duties of watching over the universe and tackling anyone who threatens the peace. Two Green Lanterns guard each of the 3,600 sectors that make up the known universe, meaning there are 7,200 space cops in total.

Abilities-wise, the Guardians are some of the most powerful beings in DC Comics. Their powerset includes — but isn't limited to — the ability to fly, time travel, and phase through objects; telepathy; astral projection; invulnerability to conventional weapons; energy manipulation; reality warping; size manipulation; omniscience; and force field projection.

When and why did the Guardians choose John Stewart to be Earth's next Green Lantern?

John Stewart Sr and Bernadette looking at an off-camera John Stewart Jr in Lanterns episode 3

John Stewart Sr and Bernadette condition John Jr into thinking it's his destiny to be a Green Lantern (Image credit: DC Studios/HBO)

Now that we've learned about the Guardians' comic book history, let's see how they factor into the DC Universe (DCU) TV show's story.

For starters, when Stewart is interviewed by a Guardian named Lianna (played by Laura Linney) for the chance to become Jordan's successor, we quickly learn that there are only 11 Guardians left. There were 12, but as episode 2 revealed, the former Green Lantern known as Sinestro killed one of them. You can learn more about him via my Sinestro in Lanterns explained article.

Anyway, by way of Lanterns' flashback-heavy third episode, the Guardians had originally tried to recruit Stewart's father — aka John Stewart Sr — as Earth's first Green Lantern when Stewart Jr was a baby. However, Stewart Sr failed the Guardians' 'Are you afraid?' test, so he wasn't chosen.

Traumatized by that cosmic event, Stewart Sr becomes a danger to his loved ones, so he's kicked out of the family home by his wife Bernadette. She doesn't believe her husband's claims surrounding the aforementioned event, either — until Lianna unexpectedly shows up to apologize for the trouble that the Guardians caused the Stewart family.

Lianna showing Bernadette her true Guardians of the Universe form in Lanterns episode 3

Bernadette Stewart is the only human who's seemingly seen Lianna in her true form (Image credit: DC Studios/HBO)

To keep things brief, Lianna indicates — over a late-night cup of coffee — that Stewart Jr has the makings of being a future Green Lantern. The reason? His parents are formidable individuals, so it stands to reason that, based on his genetic make-up alone, Stewart Jr would be cut from the same cloth.

After Bernadette tells all of this to Stewart Sr, they decide to raise Stewart Jr to not only be fearless, but also groom him so he will become a Green Lantern when he's older. So begins a years-long mission that sees them treat their youngest son differently from his older siblings. They train him to be undaunted and brainwash him into thinking it's his destiny to be a Green Lantern.

Aaron Pierre's John Stewart wearing his marine gear as he stands under a red light in a military plane in Lanterns episode 3

Stewart Jr follows in his father's footsteps by joining the US armed forces (Image credit: DC Studios/HBO Max)

A couple of decades later, Stewart Jr is — the emotional detachment issues born from his unique upbringing notwithstanding — well on his way to becoming the so-called 'chosen one', too.

As the saying goes, though, the best-laid plans often go awry. Now a decorated US Marine sniper, Stewart Jr is sent on a months-long mission to assassinate a prominent money launderer known as 'Gray Wolf' in the Kamchatka Peninsula. Long story short, he fails said assignment when Hal Jordan, who was eventually chosen as Earth's first Green Lantern, surprisingly arrives and arrests the highly sought-after criminal. Forced to take the blame as part of a government cover-up, Stewart Jr is dishonorably discharged by the military.

John Stewart using a Green Lantern ring to construct his dad's watch as a Guardian of the Universe looks on in Lanterns episode 3

John demonstrates his ability to create constructs using a Green Lantern ring (Image credit: DC Studios/HBO)

Dejected after seeing his chances of becoming a Green Lantern ruined, Stewart Jr receives an unlikely pep talk from his mom, who also tells him that he's going to art school. Remember, his real passion has always been drawing, so to somewhat make up for her terrible parenting, Bernadette applied to a nearby university on his behalf. After being accepted by said university, Stewart Jr moves on from his Green Lantern dream.

Or so he thinks. Again, to keep things short, Stewart Jr is selected for what appears to be a special university project. However, the man he's trying to impress with his art skills is actually a male Guardian who, after Stewart Jr demonstrates his ability to construct his father's watch using a Green Lantern ring, is sent to be interviewed by Lianna.

Why do the Guardians want John Stewart to replace Hal Jordan?

John Stewart and Lianna sitting across a table in Lanterns episode 3

You might have been conditioned from birth, John, but you still need to interview for the position! (Image credit: DC Studios/HBO)

For myriad reasons; but two specific reasons stand out among all others.

First — and perhaps most importantly — the Guardians are concerned about Jordan's relationship with Sinestro. Sure, Jordan was the one who defeated Sinestro after the latter killed one of the Guardians, but they know Jordan still harbors affection for his former mentor.

I wouldn't be shocked if they knew Jordan had visited Sinestro for information about the Manhunters in Lanterns episode 2, either. If they do, they'll be even more worried because there's no telling what Sinestro could do or say to Jordan to win him over to Sinestro's cause.

The other reason is Jordan's reckless nature. During their chat, Lianna tells Stewart that, despite regularly being told not to interfere in terrestrial matters, Jordan continues to do so. Replacing Jordan with Stewart would mean that these impulsive interventions would stop because Stewart wouldn't defy his bosses' wishes.

After successfully passing his Green Lantern interview, all eyes are now on how and when Stewart will succeed Jordan as Earth's primary Green Lantern in the DCU Chapter One TV series. Based on what Jordan tells Stewart at the end of this episode, though, he won't go quietly into that good night. Well, until Lanterns' 2026 storyline, when Jordan is murdered by someone, anyway...



from Latest from TechRadar https://ift.tt/x29WAme

Watch US Open 2026 free on 9Now (Australia) Unlo...

US Open 2026 has served up a sensational Round 1 draw, headlined by Matteo Berrettini vs Stan Wawrinka, Rafael Jodar vs Thanasi Kokkinakis and Carlos Alcaraz vs Roman Safiullin. The hard-hitting Russian is a less-than-ideal opponent for the No.2 seed and reigning champion, who's been out of action since April with a wrist injury.

The tie that looks set to steal the show, however, is Berrettini's clash with 2016 champion Wawrinka. They met for the very first time at Wimbledon two months ago – and produced the match of the tournament. With Wawrinka set to hang up his racket this year, it could end up being his final ever appearance at a major.

The women's draw, topped by No.1 seed and back-to-back reigning champion Aryna Sabalenka, will get off to a slightly more low-key start, with Paula Badosa vs Daria Kasatkina and Venus Williams vs Sofia Kenin shaping up as the most intriguing matchups on paper.

Former world No.2 Badosa and former No.8 Kasatkina are both unseeded, while 46-year-old Williams' first meeting with 27-year-old Kenin will likely have the feel of an all-American celebration, both grand slam champions having received wildcards in a bid to maximise viewing figures.

However, there's a fascinating subplot concerning world No.1 status. By the end of the 2026 US Open, Sabalenka will have spent 99 straight weeks at the top of the rankings, and that's where it could end. Elena Rybakina, who won her first hard-court major at the Australian Open in January, will leapfrog Sabalenka if she reaches the last four.

Here's how to watch US Open 2026 from anywhere in the world. We've also listed the the seeds, recent winners and prize money below.

Can you watch US Open 2026 for free?

Yes. Free US Open 2026 coverage is being provided by Channel 9 and 9Gem in Australia, with live streaming available via 9Now.

In the US, select matches are being shown on ESPN, ESPN2 and ABC, which are all carried by YouTube TV (10-day free trial), DirecTV Stream (5-day free trial) and Hulu+Live TV (3-day free trial).

Traveling abroad right now? You can use a VPN to watch US Open for free as if you were right at home.

Use a VPN to watch US Open 2026 live streams

A VPN is handy piece of software that can make your device appear as if it's back in your home country, so you can unlock your usual service. The best VPN right now? We recommend NordVPN – it does everything and comes with up to 75% off.

🟩 NordVPN – get the world's best VPN

Not having a VPN is like leaving your front door wide open in a busy city – anyone can walk right in and take a peek.

TechRadar regularly reviews all the biggest and best VPN providers and NordVPN is our #1 choice.

Up to 75% off today
3 extra months free
Unlocks 9Now

Get NordVPN and stream US Open 2026 from anywhere.View Deal

How to watch US Open 2026 live streams in the US

US flag banner

US Open 2026 coverage is being provided by ESPN, ESPN2, ABC and ESPN Unlimited in the US.

ESPN Unlimited, which is live streaming every match on every court, costs $31.99/month or $319.99/year, but you can bundle it with Disney Plus and Hulu for $35.99/month.

New to ESPN's coverage this year is US Open RedZone, a whiparound show that will air on ESPN Unlimited from Sunday, August 30 to Friday, September 4, between 11am and 6pm ET.

ESPN Unlimited includes streaming access to ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, ESPNEWS, ESPN Deportes, SECN, ACCN, ESPN+, ESPN on ABC, SECN+, ACCNX, NFL Network and CW Sports.

Alternatively, ESPN, ESPN2 and ABC are available through Sling – specifically the Orange & Blue plan, which starts at $60.99/month. It includes ABC, NBC and Fox in select locations, plus ESPN, ESPN2, FS1, USA Network, FX and more.

Alternatively, ESPN, ESPN2 and ABC are also carried by Fubo, YouTube TV and Hulu + Live TV, each of which offers a free trial to new users.

Outside of the US? Use a VPN while you're traveling away from home to unlock your stream.

How to watch US Open 2026 live streams in the UK

UK flag

(Image credit: Other)

In the UK, live US Open 2026 coverage is being provided by Sky Sports.

Sky Sports packages start at £35/month with £22/month pricing available for those who are already customers. Remember you can also access via NOW Sports.

If you're out of the UK but still want to tune in, explore the VPN route set out above, which will help you access your accounts from anywhere.

How to watch US Open 2026 live streams in Australia

Australian flag

(Image credit: free)

US Open 2026 is free-to-air on Channel 9 and 9Gem in Australia, with live streaming available via the 9Now platform.

Stan Sport, meanwhile, will have exhaustive coverage of every court. Stan Sport costs AU$20/month on top of a Stan subscription, which itself starts at AU$9.99/month. It's also home to the Premier League, Rugby's Greatest Rivalry, Super Rugby, the Six Nations and the Nations Championship.

Not in Australia right now? You can simply use a VPN like NordVPN to watch all the action as if you were back home.

How to watch US Open 2026 live streams in Canada

Canada

(Image credit: Other)

In Canada, US Open 2026 is exclusive to TSN.

If you don't have cable, the TSN Plus streaming service costs CA$29.99/month or CA$249.99/year.

If you're out of Canada but still want to tune in, explore the VPN route set out above, which will help you access your accounts from anywhere.

US Open 2026 FAQs

Who are the US Open 2026 seeds?

US Open 2026 seeds

Men

  1. Alexander Zverev
  2. Carlos Alcaraz
  3. Felix Auger-Aliassime
  4. Novak Djokovic
  5. Flavio Cobolli
  6. Alex de Minaur
  7. Daniil Medvedev
  8. Ben Shelton
  9. Taylor Fritz
  10. Arthur Fils
  11. Frances Tiafoe
  12. Rafael Jodar
  13. Lorenzo Musetti
  14. Learner Tien
  15. Alexander Bublik
  16. Brandon Nakashima
  17. Jakub Mensik
  18. Jiri Lehecka
  19. Casper Ruud
  20. Tommy Paul
  21. Luciano Darderi
  22. Valentin Vacherot
  23. Andrey Rublev
  24. Francisco Cerundolo
  25. Alejandro Tabilo
  26. Arthur Rinderknech
  27. Tomas Martín Etcheverry
  28. Alexander Blockx
  29. Cameron Norrie
  30. Matteo Arnaldi
  31. Zizou Bergs
  32. Ignacio Buse

Women

  1. Aryna Sabalenka
  2. Elena Rybakina
  3. Jessica Pegula
  4. Coco Gauff
  5. Mirra Andreeva
  6. Linda Noskova
  7. Karolína Muchova
  8. Iga Swiatek
  9. Elina Svitolina
  10. Amanda Anisimova
  11. Marta Kostyuk
  12. Belinda Bencic
  13. Naomi Osaka
  14. Iva Jovic
  15. Diana Shnaider
  16. Sorana Cîrstea
  17. Alexandra Eala
  18. Ekaterina Alexandrova
  19. Jasmine Paolini
  20. Maja Chwalinska
  21. Anna Kalinskaya
  22. Madison Keys
  23. Elise Mertens
  24. Anastasia Potapova
  25. Marie Bouzkova
  26. Emma Navarro
  27. Barbora Krejcikova
  28. Sara Bejlek
  29. Ann Li
  30. Jelena Ostapenko
  31. Leylah Fernandez
  32. Maria Sakkari

Who are the recent US Open winners?

Recent US Open champions

Men's champions

2025 – Carlos Alcaraz
2024 – Jannik Sinner
2023 – Novak Djokovic
2022 – Carlos Alcaraz
2021 – Daniil Medvedev
2020 – Dominic Thiem
2019 – Rafael Nadal
2018 – Novak Djokovic
2017 – Rafael Nadal
2016 – Stan Wawrinka

Women's champions

2025 – Aryna Sabalenka
2024 – Aryna Sabalenka
2023 – Coco Gauff
2022 – Iga Swiatek
2021 – Emma Raducanu
2020 – Naomi Osaka
2019 – Bianca Andreescu
2018 – Naomi Osaka
2017 – Sloane Stephens
2016 – Angelique Kerber

What are the daily US Open 2026 start times?

US Open 2026 start times

Day session

From 8am PT / 11am ET / 4pm BST / 1am AEST

What is the US Open 2026 prize money?

US Open 2026 prize money

$108 million in prize money will be allocated to the players at the 2026 US Open, with the singles champions set to receive $5.5 million each.

$2.8 million will go to each finalist, $1.45 million to each semi-finalist, and $780,000 to each quarter-finalist.

Players will earn $480,000 for reaching Round 4, $290,000 for Round 3, $190,000 for Round 2, and $140,000 for Round 1.

We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example:1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service).2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad.We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.



from Latest from TechRadar https://ift.tt/u1S9Fcg

Plug-in solar is no longer a grey area. Kits unde...

Plug-in solar is no longer a grey area. Kits under 800VA are now legal to buy and connect to a standard socket; no installer required. The government has been promising this since March. Now it is finally here.

But legal does not mean simple. The market has split into three very different products, sold under one loose banner. Solar-only kits that plug straight into a socket — these are then ones that have just been made legal. Then there are battery-only power stations that store grid electricity for later, which still need professional installation. Lastly, there are solar-plus-battery systems that do both. Each behaves differently. Each saves a different amount. And, crucially, only the first one is actually covered by the new rules.

I started my solar journey about a year ago, initially with batteries and now branching into solar panels. But with the advent of new rules and new products, the market is opening up for those who want to turn a modest investment into a reduction in every electricity bill merely by deploying a few solar panels and connecting them to a wall socket.

To help you decide whether or not to buy a plug-in solar kit, or opt for one of the other two options, I've crunched the numbers below for all three scenarios — and thrown in my personal experiences over the past year.

How much can you save?

Couple standing on balcony holding solar panel

(Image credit: Getty Images, Westend61)

This question takes inspiration from the classic “how long is a piece of string?”, because there are many factors that impact the answer. These include where you live, the underlying cost of power in that region, the equipment you plan to deploy, and the tariffs you will use with the hardware.

If we consider three basic scenarios: solar only, solar with battery and battery-only, then the amount each requires in investment and the cost benefits vary significantly.

Let's look at each of these and see how much you can spend, how much the return might be, and how that influences the payback period.

Solar only: the numbers brands are quoting

A plug-in solar balcony panel in Germany

(Image credit: Getty Images / imageBROKER / Robert Poorten)

On the solar-only pathway, EcoFlow says its standard kit, two 400W panels and a microinverter, can save you up to £115 a year. That fits the government's estimate that the newly-legalised plug-in solar can save you "up to £110 a year".

So what's the payback period? The EcoFlow panels cost around £299, and the microinverter is about £100, so the payback would be roughly four years. A retail provider, City Plumbing, puts a good 800W kit at £100 to £250 a year, with a four-to six-year payback on hardware costing £600 to £1,000.

Independent estimates land lower and more cautiously. One detailed breakdown puts realistic savings at £40 to £85 a year for an 800W kit, because without battery storage, you only self-consume between 25-40% of what the panels generate. The rest goes nowhere useful, since you have no battery to hold it and, without MCS certification, no export tariff to sell it into either.

That last point matters more than any brochure figure. A solar-only kit under the new rules cannot claim the Smart Export Guarantee. There is no MCS certification path for an 800VA socket device. So every kilowatt hour you don't use the moment it is generated is simply wasted. Real savings depend entirely on how much daytime electricity your home actually uses with the fridge, router, standby devices, the odd load of washing.

A sensible expectation for a solar-only kit is in the £70 to £110 a year ballpark, weighted toward the low end unless your daytime usage is unusually high. Most of that saving comes in the summer months, with much less in winter.

The answer to the solar-energy-you-can’t-use dilemma is a battery, because then you can use every part of the solar generation. If your standing demand is less than what you generate, then the excess can go into a battery that you then use when solar is below that threshold.

Plug-in batteries aren't currently legal in the UK, despite the likes of Octopus Energy telling us recently that they are "the real game-changer". That means that, right now, going this route requires some professional help — but it can also open up much bigger savings...

Battery only: a different game entirely

An EcoFlow plug-in battery in an attic plugged into the wall

(Image credit: EcoFlow)

What do you do if you don’t have a good location for solar panels to be hung or mounted, or if you rent a property that doesn’t allow things to be hung on balconies?

What many people don’t realise is that the price of power varies over a typical day, being relatively cheap at low-demand times, like the middle of the day, and becoming more expensive between 4pm and 7pm, when lots of people start cooking.

There are tariffs, such as Octopus Agile, that break the day into 30-minute slices with different prices for each, and these amounts vary based on wholesale energy costs and how renewable resources are affected by the weather (for example, if it's windy).

With a battery, you can capture power from the grid when it's cheap, and then use it when the price is elevated. And, depending on how much battery capacity you have and how it's wired to the property, you could even make a profit by selling it back to the grid during peak demand.

A good example of this is offered by the Zendure Hyper 2000, an inverter designed to couple batteries (and solar) to the electrics of the home. It charges overnight on a tariff like Octopus Go, roughly 9p per kilowatt-hour, then discharges through the day when the standard rate sits around 24.67p. Do that consistently on an appropriately-sized battery and Zendure's own figures suggest £250 to £300 a year is realistic, once you count that alongside any solar contribution.

Solar and battery combined: the biggest savings, with the biggest asterisk

The Anker Solix Solarbank 4 Pro

(Image credit: Anker)

This is where the most eye-catching claims live. One comparison site quotes 90% self-consumption on an 860kWh annual generation figure, working out at roughly £191 a year. Another puts the jump plainly: without a battery, you self-consume 30 to 40 per cent of what you generate. With one, you jump to between 85 and 93 per cent. That is the difference between an £80-a-year system and a £180-a-year one, but getting that saving requires additional investment.

For example, Anker's Solix Solarbank E1600 is a 1.6kWh battery, rated for 6,000 cycles with still 80% capacity, which works out to over 16 years of daily use for roughly £910 up front. Similarly, the EcoFlow Stream series integrates the microinverter and battery management directly, which is more efficient than bolting a separate power station onto a standard microinverter. The Stream Ultra costs £900, offers 1.92kWh capacity, and can connect 2800W of solar input.

Realistic savings for a properly installed solar plus battery balcony system? About £150 to £300 a year, with the top end reserved for households that also actively manage a time-of-use tariff and have the battery capacity to exploit when prices are low.

A slight snag...

The new interim specification from the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero covers solar generation only. It says plainly that these socket-connected devices must not be used with a battery storage system.

So the tidy, self-contained kits with a battery built in, the ones EcoFlow, Anker, and Bluetti are currently selling as balcony solar, do not qualify for the simple socket route at all. They still need a hardwired connection through a fused spur, fitted by a qualified electrician, notified to your network operator under G98 within 28 days.

This may change, but that’s where the regulations stand as of August 27 2026.

My own journey

EcoFlow Stream Ultra X System

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

My electricity bill alone in 2025 was £1,543.80, which was sufficient motivation to do something about it.

The approach I took was to buy an EcoFlow Stream Ultra X, a 3.84 kWh LFP battery, and have it professionally connected to my mains power through a fused spur. That only happened at the end of April, so I’ve only been running on battery support since then.

In those four months, I’ve used Octopus Agile and reviewed the power profile each day to optimise when I collect power at the cheapest rate. I’ve experimented with attaching some solar panels to see what that brings to the table, and I will probably add roof-mounted solar next year.

Running with a battery for four months, at the two-thirds point of the year, we’re at roughly £900 spent on power, meaning that this year should top out at about £1350, making for about a £200 advantage. But looking at the year breakdown, I’m consuming more power but paying less for it. I’m expecting that number to be closer to £350 by the time 2027 rolls around. But that doesn’t factor in the price rises that might have pushed my bill up.

To get that improvement, I’ve invested £1,250 in battery technology, and I’ve also had a new consumer unit fitted that cost almost as much. Therefore, my payback is closer to eight years, but only based on current power costs, not what they might be in 2034.

With this working as well as it seems, I’ve doubled down, bought a second Stream Ultra X, and I’m going to add solar to the mix soon.

New products I’ll be looking at in the coming months, like the EcoFlow Stream 5000 and EcoFlow Gateway, might further skew my plans, depending on what they bring to this power party.

EcoFlow Stream Ultra X System
The EcoFlow app shows you what's happening and enables total controlMark Pickavance
EcoFlow Stream Ultra X System
Power is pulled into the battery when its cheap, and exported when its expensiveMark Pickavance
EcoFlow Stream Ultra X System
Ironically, overall consumption might be higher than normal for the whole dayMark Pickavance
EcoFlow Stream Ultra X System
A typical day. Charging in the middle of the day and using from 4pm onwards.Mark Pickavance
EcoFlow Stream Ultra X System
When power is at its cheapest, the impact on daily costs is hugeMark Pickavance

Plug-in solar: the bottom line

EcoFlow Stream Ultra X

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

Plug-in solar going legal on August 27 is genuinely useful news for renters and flat dwellers who have had no route into solar at all.

But the marketing gap between "up to £110 a year" and the more sober £40 to £85 a year some analysts are quoting is wide, and the reason is simple. Brochure figures assume ideal conditions and often quietly assume a battery, which the new simplified rules do not actually permit.

Treat solar-only kits as a modest, genuinely no-fuss saving in the £70 to £150 bracket. Treat battery-only setups as a tariff arbitrage tool worth £150 to £250 a year if you have the right rate. And treat combined systems as the strongest performer, £150 to £300 a year, but budget for an electrician and G98 paperwork rather than a Sunday afternoon plug-and-play job.

None of these numbers replaces a proper rooftop installation. But for a segment of the market that has had nothing available to it until now, even the conservative figures represent a real, if modest, win.

However, it’s also worth saying that there are at least two reasons you should be considering it even if the current savings seem modest. First, a simple solar-only deployment is the first rung on a ladder to power self-sufficiency; second, grid power isn’t getting any cheaper in the foreseeable future.

It’s about time we stopped accepting that utility services only go up in price, and now it's possible to actually do something about it.



from Latest from TechRadar https://ift.tt/Z9wQAY2

Ready for another bout of back-stabbing and treac...

Ready for another bout of back-stabbing and treachery from the Emerald Isle? The Traitors Ireland and its host Siobhán McSweeney are back from another series of banishments and murders as the conniving players try to gameplay their way to a €50,000 cash prize.

You can watch The Traitors Ireland season 2 online from anywhere with a VPN and potentially for free.

Next episode: Premiere on Sunday, Aug. 30 at 9.30pm BST / 4.30pm ET

Watch free: RTÉ Player (IRE)

Use NordVPN to watch any stream

The 18th century Slane Castle – around an hour north of Dublin – is once again the suitably gothic venue for the fiendish games of loyalty and betrayal. Prepare for the usual high-tension gatherings around the fire pit, as the Faithfuls try to work out who they can and can't trust, while the Traitors... well, they have nothing but murder on their minds!

Assuming the series follows the same format as the first one, you can expect episodes to go out at 9.30pm IST (so 4.30pm ET) on Sundays, Mondays and Tuesday for four weeks. And that's followed each episode by the show's sister show The Traitors Ireland Uncloaked for all the gossip and analysis with presenter Kevin McGahern.

Read on as we explain how to watch The Traitors Ireland season 2 from anywhere.

Can I watch The Traitors Ireland season 2 for free?

Yes. Faithfuls in Ireland can watch The Traitors Ireland season 2 FREE of charge on RTÉ One and the channel's RTÉ Player streaming platform and app.

Watch The Traitors Ireland S2 for FREE on RTE Player

Season 2 of The Traitors Ireland will stream for free in Ireland on RTÉ Player. The streaming service doesn’t require an account or subscription — just find the stream and watch away.

Going abroad at all during season 2? Unlock RTÉ Player with NordVPN – more details below.View Deal

How to watch The Traitors Ireland season 2 from anywhere

If you're keen to watch The Traitors Ireland but you're away from home and access to the show is geo-blocked, you can always use a VPN to access it (assuming you're not breaching any broadcaster T&Cs, of course). You may be surprised by how simple it is to do.

Use one of the best VPNs to watch The Traitors Ireland season 2 from anywhere:

🟩 NordVPN – get the world's best VPN

Not having a VPN is like leaving your front door wide open in a busy city – anyone can walk right in and take a peek.

TechRadar regularly reviews all the biggest and best VPN providers and NordVPN is our #1 choice.

75% Off Today
3 Extra Months Free
Unlocks RTÉ Player

Get NordVPN and stream The Traitors Ireland season 2 for free.View Deal

Using a VPN is incredibly simple:

1. Install the VPN of your choice. As we've said, NordVPN is our favorite.

2. Choose the location you wish to connect to in the VPN app. For instance, if you're visiting the US and want to view your usual Irish service, you'd select an Ireland-based server from the list.

3. Sit back and enjoy the action. Head to your usual local streaming service and watch the show.

Can I watch The Traitors Ireland season 2 in the US?

US flag

Strangely, The Traitors Ireland hasn't been picked up by any networks or streaming services in the US. Not even on Peacock, which is generally home to all things The Traitors.

If you're an Irish resident who is currently across the pond, a VPN will help you tune in for free. NordVPN is our recommended provider, and you can find out why with our in-depth NordVPN review.

Can I watch The Traitors Ireland season 2 in Canada?

Canada flag

It looks like Canadians will have to wait a short while to watch all the goings on from The Traitors Ireland season 2. Subscription service Crave did show the first run, but not until a few months after it originally aired in Ireland.

Crave plans start from CA$11.99 a month and offers classic HBO series, on-demand movies and Crave originals alongside shows like The Traitors.

Outside of Canada? Use a VPN to gain access to all the content you'd normally stream at home.

Can I watch The Traitors Ireland season 2 in the UK?

uk flag banner

The first season of The Traitors Ireland was available to stream on the BBC iPlayer in the UK, but not for a few months after it aired in Ireland.

If the BBC follows the same release schedule this time around, you'll be waiting until January 2027 to watch The Traitors Ireland season 2 in the UK.

Visiting the UK? from Ireland Use a VPN to access your usual The Traitors Ireland on RTÉ Player.

Can I watch The Traitors Ireland season 2 in Australia?

Australian flag

The Traitors Ireland season 2 is likely to go out online via Paramount Plus in Australia, but no launch date has yet been announced. We'll update this section as and when that gets announced in due course.

The free-to-air 10 streaming platform is also streaming the first season of the show, but didn't land there until June this year – a whole 10 months after it went out in Ireland.

Outside Australia? NordVPN will help you gain access to free 10 streams while you're out of the country.

The Traitors Ireland season 2 – Need to Know

The Traitors Ireland season 2 trailer

How many episodes of The Traitors Ireland season 2 are there?

The first season of The Traitors Ireland comprised 12 episodes, so we expect season 2 to follow suit. That would make the airdate of the finale around Tuesday, August 22.

We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example:1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service).2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad.We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.



from Latest from TechRadar https://ift.tt/3rXqGiC